All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com, babu.moger@netapp.com,
	sekharan@us.ibm.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dm mpath: add support for using previously attached scsi_dh
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 10:05:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120508140541.GB8383@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA8BBA3.3030705@suse.de>

On Tue, May 08 2012 at  2:22am -0400,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote:

> On 05/08/2012 05:19 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > Use the previously attached scsi_dh if "default" is provided as the
> > hardware handler name (the new 'use_default_hw_handler' flag is set in
> > the multipath structure).
> > 
> > Leverage scsi_dh_attach's ability to increment the scsi_dh's reference
> > count if the same scsi_dh name is provided when attaching -- currently
> > attached scsi_dh name is determined with scsi_dh_attached_handler_name.
> > 
> Not sure it that's the correct way.
> 
> Using 'default' as the hardware handler name has the drawback that
> the original information (ie the original hardware handler name)
> is lost.

BTW, on this point: How is the original handler's name lost with my
patches?  I set m->hw_handler_name to the original (aka attached)
handler's name (as returned scsi_dh_attached_handler_name).

"default" is only used as a key to trigger the use of the attached
handler (it causes m->use_default_hw_handler to be set).

Was my description or code somehow unclear?  Guess so... otherwise I'd
not be clarifying this... unfortunately I'm not seeing where I fell
short.

Mike

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-08 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-08  3:19 [PATCH 2/3] scsi_dh: add scsi_dh_attached_handler_name Mike Snitzer
2012-05-08  3:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] dm mpath: add support for using previously attached scsi_dh Mike Snitzer
2012-05-08  6:22   ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-05-08 13:36     ` Mike Snitzer
2012-05-08 14:05     ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2012-05-08 16:20       ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120508140541.GB8383@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@netapp.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.