From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/3] xfs: limit specualtive delalloc to maxioffset
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 13:02:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120508180256.GM16881@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120429124319.GT9541@dastard>
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:43:19PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Speculative delayed allocation beyond EOF near the maximum supported
> file offset can result in creating delalloc extents beyond
> mp->m_maxioffset (8EB). These can never be trimmed during
> xfs_free_eof_blocks() because they are beyond mp->m_maxioffset, and
> that results in assert failures in xfs_fs_destroy_inode() due to
> delalloc blocks still being present. xfstests 071 exposes this
> problem.
>
> Limit speculative delalloc to mp->m_maxioffset to avoid this
> problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index 303c03a..4a08ea3 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -412,6 +412,15 @@ retry:
> return error;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Make sure preallocation does not create extents beyond the range we
> + * actually support in this filesystem.
> + */
> + if (last_fsb > XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, mp->m_maxioffset))
> + last_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, mp->m_maxioffset);
> +
> + ASSERT(last_fsb > offset_fsb);
> +
Yeah, looks good. xfs_iomap_prealloc_size isn't the only one who can push us
up above m_maxioffset, so this is the right place for the check.
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-08 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-27 9:45 [PATCH 0/3] xfs: failed writes and stale delalloc blocks Dave Chinner
2012-04-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: punch all delalloc blocks beyond EOF on write failure Dave Chinner
2012-04-30 13:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-04-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: punch new delalloc blocks out of failed writes inside EOF Dave Chinner
2012-05-07 22:00 ` Ben Myers
2012-04-27 9:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: prevent needless mount warning causing test failures Dave Chinner
2012-05-08 16:29 ` Ben Myers
2012-05-08 22:42 ` Dave Chinner
2012-04-29 11:16 ` [PATCH 4/3] xfs: don't assert on delalloc regions beyond EOF Dave Chinner
2012-05-08 17:26 ` Ben Myers
2012-04-29 12:43 ` [PATCH 5/3] xfs: limit specualtive delalloc to maxioffset Dave Chinner
2012-05-08 18:02 ` Ben Myers [this message]
2012-04-29 12:57 ` [PATCH 6/3] xfs: make largest supported offset less shouty Dave Chinner
2012-04-29 21:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-04-30 1:11 ` Dave Chinner
2012-04-30 3:03 ` Dave Chinner
2012-05-08 18:15 ` Ben Myers
2012-05-08 22:43 ` Dave Chinner
2012-05-09 19:14 ` Ben Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120508180256.GM16881@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.