From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rob@landley.net,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, luto@mit.edu, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
avi@redhat.com, johnstul@us.ibm.com, arjan@linux.intel.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [x86]: Improve secondary CPU bring-up process robustness
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 15:12:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120509131258.GA24979@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336555184.2527.6.camel@twins>
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> I'm not quite sure how far along he is, but it would be
> awesome if you could help him out somehow.
bits of Thomas's rework are in latest -tip, the tip:smp/hotplug
branch, also merged into tip:master and soon to linux-next.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-09 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-09 10:24 [PATCH 0/5] [x86]: Improve secondary CPU bring-up process robustness Igor Mammedov
2012-05-09 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-09 12:29 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-05-09 13:12 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-05-10 17:31 ` Rob Landley
2012-05-10 17:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-09 10:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] Fix soft-lookup in stop machine on secondary cpu bring up Igor Mammedov
2012-05-09 15:04 ` Shuah Khan
2012-05-09 15:22 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-05-09 15:34 ` Shuah Khan
2012-05-10 15:26 ` Shuah Khan
2012-05-10 16:29 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-05-10 16:38 ` Shuah Khan
2012-05-11 11:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-11 15:16 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-05-11 21:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-12 19:32 ` [RFC] [x86]: abort secondary cpu bringup gracefully Igor Mammedov
2012-05-12 17:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-12 18:51 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-05-14 11:09 ` [RFC v2] " Igor Mammedov
2012-05-24 15:41 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-05-25 18:11 ` Rob Landley
2012-05-30 16:38 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-05-09 10:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] Take in account that several cpus might call check_tsc_sync_* at the same time Igor Mammedov
2012-05-09 10:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] Do not wait till next cpu online and abort early if lead cpu do not wait for us anymore Igor Mammedov
2012-05-09 10:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] Cancel secondary CPU bringup if boot cpu abandoned this effort Igor Mammedov
2012-05-09 10:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] Do not mark cpu as not present if we failed to boot it Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120509131258.GA24979@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@mit.edu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.