From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:54195 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932224Ab2EIOkR (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2012 10:40:17 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] Add ADC driver for Atmel G20, G45 and X5 boards Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 14:40:14 +0000 Cc: Maxime Ripard , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, thomas@free-electrons.com, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, patrice.vilchez@atmel.com References: <1336554366-16957-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> In-Reply-To: <1336554366-16957-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <201205091440.14587.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Here is another version of the patches to bring ADC driver to Atmel boards. > Since last version, here is what changed: > * Rebased on top of staging-next to move out of staging. Had to change to IIO > kfifo buffer along the way. > * Reworked the DT bindings according to Jean-Christophe reviews > * Made various fixes according to reviews > * Support for X5 boards What's the reason for providing both DT and non-DT probing in that driver? Doesn't it make more sense to just require that everyone who uses this device boots using the device tree? Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 14:40:14 +0000 Subject: [PATCHv3] Add ADC driver for Atmel G20, G45 and X5 boards In-Reply-To: <1336554366-16957-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> References: <1336554366-16957-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <201205091440.14587.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Here is another version of the patches to bring ADC driver to Atmel boards. > Since last version, here is what changed: > * Rebased on top of staging-next to move out of staging. Had to change to IIO > kfifo buffer along the way. > * Reworked the DT bindings according to Jean-Christophe reviews > * Made various fixes according to reviews > * Support for X5 boards What's the reason for providing both DT and non-DT probing in that driver? Doesn't it make more sense to just require that everyone who uses this device boots using the device tree? Arnd