From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:60864 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756728Ab2EIOqs (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2012 10:46:48 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] Add ADC driver for Atmel G20, G45 and X5 boards Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 14:46:40 +0000 Cc: Maxime Ripard , Jonathan Cameron , Olof Johansson , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, thomas@free-electrons.com, patrice.vilchez@atmel.com, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com References: <1336554366-16957-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <4FAA7CB6.8030506@atmel.com> In-Reply-To: <4FAA7CB6.8030506@atmel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <201205091446.40849.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Jonathan, Arnd, Olof, > > As explained by Maxime, this patch series is adding the Atmel ADC driver > to the out-of-staging iio subsystem. It relies on patches that are in > staging-next. > On the other hand, I really wouldn't like to split the series between > iio and arm-soc... > My question is: would it be possible to take this series in Jonathan > iio/staging-next git tree for inclusion in 3.5? Arnd & Olof, is it ok > for you? Do you want to add your Acked-by on some patches? Hmm, if we would do only the DT-based probing for this, it would be very simple to split the patches between the two branches, but with the dependency on the platform_data definition, we can't do that. If you think we still need the platform_data, I guess it can go in the iio tree, but I'd be happier if we didn't need it any more. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 14:46:40 +0000 Subject: [PATCHv3] Add ADC driver for Atmel G20, G45 and X5 boards In-Reply-To: <4FAA7CB6.8030506@atmel.com> References: <1336554366-16957-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <4FAA7CB6.8030506@atmel.com> Message-ID: <201205091446.40849.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Jonathan, Arnd, Olof, > > As explained by Maxime, this patch series is adding the Atmel ADC driver > to the out-of-staging iio subsystem. It relies on patches that are in > staging-next. > On the other hand, I really wouldn't like to split the series between > iio and arm-soc... > My question is: would it be possible to take this series in Jonathan > iio/staging-next git tree for inclusion in 3.5? Arnd & Olof, is it ok > for you? Do you want to add your Acked-by on some patches? Hmm, if we would do only the DT-based probing for this, it would be very simple to split the patches between the two branches, but with the dependency on the platform_data definition, we can't do that. If you think we still need the platform_data, I guess it can go in the iio tree, but I'd be happier if we didn't need it any more. Arnd