From: Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com>
To: "Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: mtd oob test is failing consistently at same places in NAND flash
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 17:24:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120509152437.GA12280@parrot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3E9366EF@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 04:12:05PM +0100, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 00:15:16, Ivan Djelic wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 04:09:46PM +0100, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 18:53:54, Ivan Djelic wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 01:33:06PM +0100, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > We are having an 8-bit NAND part (MT29F2G08ABAEAWP from Micron)
> > > > > connected to GPMC Module (General purpose memory controller) from TI.
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > How is ecc performed ?
> > > > Using NAND internal ecc ? or with GPMC 1-bit Hamming ? 4-bit/8-bit BCH ?
> > > > Which version of omap2 driver are you using ?
> > > > Is OOB also ECC-protected ?
> > >
> > > Hardware ECC is performing.
> > > 4-bit BCH ECC scheme is used.
> > > I am using omap2 driver in Linux 3.2.0 Kernel. Don't know omap2 driver version.
> >
> > You are probably using a patched kernel, since 3.2.0 does not have GPMC BCH support ?!
> > What is your ecc layout ? Does it expose oobfree regions ?
> >
>
> Yes, we had using patched kernel. OOB free region is exposed.
>
> ECC layout will be as follows.
>
> 0-1 -> BAD block marking
> 2-57 -> ECC byte position, ( 14 bytes for 512 byte)
> 58-63 -> oob free bytes
>
> mtd->ecclayout->eccbytes = 56
> mtd->ecclayout->eccpos[0] = 2
> mtd->ecclayout->oobavail = 6
> mtd->ecclayout->oobfree[0].offset = 58
> mtd->ecclayout->oobfree[0].length = 6
>
OK, then it is quite normal that mtd_oobtest should fail when it encounters a
bitflip (one that does not match the programmed data) in those unprotected 6
bytes (58-63). What do you think ?
BR,
--
Ivan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-09 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-08 12:33 mtd oob test is failing consistently at same places in NAND flash Philip, Avinash
2012-05-08 13:23 ` Ivan Djelic
2012-05-08 15:09 ` Philip, Avinash
2012-05-08 15:23 ` Philip, Avinash
2012-05-08 18:45 ` Ivan Djelic
2012-05-09 15:12 ` Philip, Avinash
2012-05-09 15:24 ` Ivan Djelic [this message]
2012-05-09 15:46 ` Philip, Avinash
2012-05-09 16:05 ` Ivan Djelic
2012-05-10 7:51 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2012-05-09 6:37 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2012-05-10 13:01 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120509152437.GA12280@parrot.com \
--to=ivan.djelic@parrot.com \
--cc=avinashphilip@ti.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.