From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:58398 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755716Ab2EJN2q (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2012 09:28:46 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] Add ADC driver for Atmel G20, G45 and X5 boards Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 13:28:36 +0000 Cc: Maxime Ripard , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, thomas@free-electrons.com, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, patrice.vilchez@atmel.com References: <1336554366-16957-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <4FAB7D29.9000107@free-electrons.com> <4FAB815A.8040109@atmel.com> In-Reply-To: <4FAB815A.8040109@atmel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <201205101328.36524.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 10 May 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > So I would really like to keep the non-DT probing. This will give the > ability for users to experiment IIO/ADC with whichever kernel revision, > whichever AT91 SoC they like. > > Arnd, we will have to agree on a way to push this work into mainline, > but please consider keeping the non-DT part for this driver. Ok. If the non-DT part is important to you, I suggest you merge it all through the IIO tree, to avoid dependency problems with the platform data header file. Please add my Acked-by for the arch/arm patches. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 13:28:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCHv3] Add ADC driver for Atmel G20, G45 and X5 boards In-Reply-To: <4FAB815A.8040109@atmel.com> References: <1336554366-16957-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <4FAB7D29.9000107@free-electrons.com> <4FAB815A.8040109@atmel.com> Message-ID: <201205101328.36524.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 10 May 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > So I would really like to keep the non-DT probing. This will give the > ability for users to experiment IIO/ADC with whichever kernel revision, > whichever AT91 SoC they like. > > Arnd, we will have to agree on a way to push this work into mainline, > but please consider keeping the non-DT part for this driver. Ok. If the non-DT part is important to you, I suggest you merge it all through the IIO tree, to avoid dependency problems with the platform data header file. Please add my Acked-by for the arch/arm patches. Arnd