From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:22:14 +0000 Subject: [PATCH RESEND v8] gpio: Device tree support for LPC32xx In-Reply-To: <4FAD0A79.8040207@antcom.de> References: <1336679838-30738-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <201205111219.10025.arnd@arndb.de> <4FAD0A79.8040207@antcom.de> Message-ID: <201205111322.15191.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 11 May 2012, Roland Stigge wrote: > Right. Personally, I would be fine with either of my v8 (all banks in > dt, referenced naturally by name) and v9 (one simple DT entry for the > whole GPIO controller, integer index for referencing banks) patches. > > Consider the DT-documented mapping in the latter case: > > 0: GPIO P0 > 1: GPIO P1 > 2: GPIO P2 > 3: GPIO P3 > 4: GPI P3 > 5: GPO P3 > > Not too difficult and would also be acceptable, IMO. > > So Arnd and Grant, please agree one of those and pick it. :-) > Grant is maintainer for both GPIO and DT, so his opinion is what counts in this case. I was merely giving the background on how we got there so he can make an informed decision. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v8] gpio: Device tree support for LPC32xx Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:22:14 +0000 Message-ID: <201205111322.15191.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1336679838-30738-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <201205111219.10025.arnd@arndb.de> <4FAD0A79.8040207@antcom.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FAD0A79.8040207@antcom.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Roland Stigge Cc: Grant Likely , arm@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, kevin.wells@nxp.com, srinivas.bakki@nxp.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Friday 11 May 2012, Roland Stigge wrote: > Right. Personally, I would be fine with either of my v8 (all banks in > dt, referenced naturally by name) and v9 (one simple DT entry for the > whole GPIO controller, integer index for referencing banks) patches. > > Consider the DT-documented mapping in the latter case: > > 0: GPIO P0 > 1: GPIO P1 > 2: GPIO P2 > 3: GPIO P3 > 4: GPI P3 > 5: GPO P3 > > Not too difficult and would also be acceptable, IMO. > > So Arnd and Grant, please agree one of those and pick it. :-) > Grant is maintainer for both GPIO and DT, so his opinion is what counts in this case. I was merely giving the background on how we got there so he can make an informed decision. Arnd