From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: Load increase after memory upgrade (part2) Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 15:41:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20120511194138.GA30099@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Carsten Schiers Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-devel , Jan Beulich , Sander Eikelenboom List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:39:08AM +0200, Carsten Schiers wrote: > Hi Konrad, > = > =A0 > don't want to be pushy, as I have no real issue. I simply use the Xenifie= d kernel or take the double load. = > = > But I think this mistery is still open. My last status was that the lates= t patch you produced resulted in a BUG, = Yes, that is right. Thank you for reminding me. > = > so we still have not checked whether our theory is correct. No we haven't. And I should be have no trouble reproducing this. I can just= write a tiny module that allocates vmalloc_32(). But your timming sucks - I am going on a week vacation next week :-( Ah, if there was just a cloning machine - I could stick myself in it, and Baseline_0 goes on vacation, while Clone_1 goes on working. Then git merge Baseline_0 and Clone_1 in a week and fixup the merge conflicts and continue on. Sigh. Can I ask you to be patient with me once more and ping me in a week - when I am back from vacation and my brain is fresh to work on this?