From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steffen Klassert Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: fix incorrect ipsec transport mode fragment Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 13:48:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20120515114840.GC24733@secunet.com> References: <20120215104021.GC31660@secunet.com> <1336965660-14201-1-git-send-email-gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com> <20120514130528.GA24733@secunet.com> <4FB1D11A.4040206@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, lw@cn.fujitsu.com To: Gao feng Return-path: Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([195.81.216.161]:52338 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757851Ab2EOLsp (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2012 07:48:45 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FB1D11A.4040206@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:44:26AM +0800, Gao feng wrote: > > how about add a function pointer append_data to the struct rt6_info? > so we can just call rt->append_data in ip6_append_data without conside > witch mode it is. > If you want to use a function pointer, it should go to stuct xfrm_mode. That's where the IPsec mode dependent functions reside. A side note, I'll be off for three weeks starting from tomorrow. I'll have no E-mail access most of the time, so I'll probaply not respond for the next three weeks.