From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] cleanup samsung plat-s3c24xx and s5p for v3.5 Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 14:45:50 +0000 Message-ID: <201205151445.50516.arnd@arndb.de> References: <4FAEEFD3.9040907@samsung.com> <201205141917.35692.arnd@arndb.de> <07f201cd3272$595ba050$0c12e0f0$%kim@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:63463 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932729Ab2EOOpx (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2012 10:45:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <07f201cd3272$595ba050$0c12e0f0$%kim@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: 'Olof Johansson' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 15 May 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > I've pulled the next/cleanup-samsung-iommu into next/drivers and th= e >=20 > But I think would be better if you could pull the next/devel-samsung-= iommu into next/drivers instead of next/cleanup-samsung-iommu. > Because actual iommu driver is included in next/devel-samsung-iommu b= ranch and the next/cleanup-samsung-iommu branch includes just > cleanup current Samsung iommu driver. Ah, right. I though this was going through J=F6rg's IOMMU tree, but I s= aw now that he agreed to having the new driver merged through arm-soc. I've pulled both branches into next/drivers now. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 14:45:50 +0000 Subject: [GIT PULL] cleanup samsung plat-s3c24xx and s5p for v3.5 In-Reply-To: <07f201cd3272$595ba050$0c12e0f0$%kim@samsung.com> References: <4FAEEFD3.9040907@samsung.com> <201205141917.35692.arnd@arndb.de> <07f201cd3272$595ba050$0c12e0f0$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: <201205151445.50516.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tuesday 15 May 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > I've pulled the next/cleanup-samsung-iommu into next/drivers and the > > But I think would be better if you could pull the next/devel-samsung-iommu into next/drivers instead of next/cleanup-samsung-iommu. > Because actual iommu driver is included in next/devel-samsung-iommu branch and the next/cleanup-samsung-iommu branch includes just > cleanup current Samsung iommu driver. Ah, right. I though this was going through J?rg's IOMMU tree, but I saw now that he agreed to having the new driver merged through arm-soc. I've pulled both branches into next/drivers now. Arnd