From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: S3C64XX: Hook up carrier class modules on Cragganmore Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 18:37:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20120515173706.GD4140@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1337016041-16096-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1337016041-16096-2-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <07fc01cd3278$dbbf63f0$933e2bd0$%kim@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SO98HVl1bnMOfKZd" Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:60827 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966081Ab2EORhM (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2012 13:37:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <07fc01cd3278$dbbf63f0$933e2bd0$%kim@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com --SO98HVl1bnMOfKZd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 05:58:12PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Looks good to me, but there is no '{ I2C_BOARD_INFO("wlf-gf-module", 0x20) },' in my tree. > Just adding address 0x22 stuff is enough now? Yes, it is - sorry, context diff for another project. --SO98HVl1bnMOfKZd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPspQ4AAoJEBus8iNuMP3dDBwQAJ29Nh132OKBytiE+lbyHtpq fPBspjtMdPXJuTl3ihxI5fBMLkQRNjGA6guXEEVipyiPH3UEqbhaLhgye6T5FeR3 CccqgBuDkJGoiSsQDBWfC6Cl9pTn/ZEcEo0Ug4C2gltgyepR+ZGZIKxgiawn+JyV gQshiw81r5WTrydMEDRSxdnSFpUkqS5xeAQqnEWMyqRBkU/+4OLdEh8I69Pwq7KQ FuqJBHsiV48xDCruoR8uRnHI3PNqth3ebmEN1Yfz9bAGf+TG16JVZhLHchvbQ2VN vBuRU2+eRuj+JqIOCPEthHaQWZCCVvy1sMbtl499tP8doyUVTManOkSIVu6mSnKC 5zM+5abtVLPt0ALcB1Q47NXLSsFWphT27HtPyUVoLFaXdOrSZhQ8Bjiox+Semxay gGTs+6T38jf+8DgAieIpelFcf5z4TBk5nWyFrd4U8QWvGySw3nJd6PBSB3MkQcef n22j2yg+8dHzgggAAX9T2y2jxvhvg2NsFNgiO9XnNezK87s0rH9IBYzYJV2ZlI9m zI/l9P/CjdYzKvQ+DAU53plYfgbh6EiWmBrGWNAtoHpq3LWhBnln9DPM/lJabjXk 9LiKFZM3kV1PCbZM3qYHh+lQUCpiKyPOwd/Dja0O/esKRE/RakOrMcq11KJJblEg x9vEaiaqMgQ9mPVMShcq =Jx5U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SO98HVl1bnMOfKZd-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 18:37:09 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: S3C64XX: Hook up carrier class modules on Cragganmore In-Reply-To: <07fc01cd3278$dbbf63f0$933e2bd0$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1337016041-16096-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1337016041-16096-2-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <07fc01cd3278$dbbf63f0$933e2bd0$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20120515173706.GD4140@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 05:58:12PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Looks good to me, but there is no '{ I2C_BOARD_INFO("wlf-gf-module", 0x20) },' in my tree. > Just adding address 0x22 stuff is enough now? Yes, it is - sorry, context diff for another project. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: