From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn) Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 13:36:28 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] arm: Add basic support for new Marvell Armada SoC family In-Reply-To: References: <1337072084-21967-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20120515091838.GC6820@lunn.ch> <4FB22727.6090406@codethink.co.uk> <20120515115511.75ece9c3@skate> <4FB269CB.4080804@gmail.com> <20120515164438.22258885@skate> Message-ID: <20120516113628.GA14362@lunn.ch> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Lior Thanks for the list. > I'll try to arrange our SoCs (EBU): > > Orion family: > Flavors: > 5082, 5181, 5181L, 5281, 6183, ... > Core: ARMv5 compatible (Feroceon and Jolteon) > Process: 90nm > Directory: mach-orion5x mach-orion5x also supports 5182, which is not on your list. > Kirkwood family: > Flavors: > 6190, 6192, ... > Core: ARMv5 compatible (Gandalf) > Process: 65nm > Directory: mach-kirkwood > > 6282 a.k.a Kirkwood 55, Armada 300 > 6283 a.k.a Kirkwood 55, Armada 310 > Core: ARMv5 compatible (Gandalf) > Process: 55nm > Directory: not in mainline, future plan mach-kirkwood supports 6180 6190 6192 6281 6282 6180 and 6281 are not on your list. > > 6710 a.k.a Kirkwood 40, Armada 370 > Core: ARMv7 compatible (PJ4B) > Process: 40nm > Directory: new code > > Discovery family: > Flavors: > 78100/78200 a.k.a DiscoDuo > Core: ARMv5 compatible (Gandalf) > Process: 65nm > Directory: mach-mv78xx0 > > 78230/78260/78460 a.k.a DiscoSMP, Armada XP > Core: ARMv7 compatible (PJ4B) > Process: 40nm > Directory: new code > > Avanta family: (a.k.a Kirkwood 2) > Flavors: > 6560/60, 6530P, 6510 > Core: ARMv5 compatible (Gandalf) > Process: 55nm > Directory: no code in mainline yet, future plan > > Dove: (application processor) > Flavors: > ap510 a.k.a Armada 510 > Core: ARMv7 compatible (PJ4) > Process: 65nm > Directory: mach-dove Is there any logic to the names/numbers? Thanks Andrew