From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 05:06:44 -0700 Message-ID: <20120516120644.GA31261@kroah.com> References: <20120516180303.3c3cff646c1a70a8ddf32e2a@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:54986 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756377Ab2EPMGt (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2012 08:06:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120516180303.3c3cff646c1a70a8ddf32e2a@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski , Kyungmin Park , Kukjin Kim , Lukasz Majewski On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 06:03:03PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-universal_c210.c between commit 6dafa4aead1b > ("ARM: EXYNOS: Add DRM core device support for Universal C210 board") > from the s5p tree and commit 126625e1bf32 ("usb:hsotg:samsung:cosmetic > Move to proper place") from the usb > tree. > > Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as > necessary. Looks good to me, thanks. greg k-h