From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:33:47 +0000 Message-ID: <201205161433.47416.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20120516185812.ce1ab57c3ec72445135a35fc@canb.auug.org.au> <201205161054.15610.arnd@arndb.de> <4FB3B1F3.6080102@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:65011 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752956Ab2EPOgh (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2012 10:36:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FB3B1F3.6080102@atmel.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson , Maxime Ripard , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 16 May 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > I am on the subject till this morning to figure out if the parameters > are SoC dependent. It seems that the ADC is the same between those two > platforms but the technology is different: I have to figure out the > details internally. > > I will give you a patch on top of arm-soc soon. It will replace the one > in staging-next: does it sound good to you? Ok, good. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:33:47 +0000 Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree In-Reply-To: <4FB3B1F3.6080102@atmel.com> References: <20120516185812.ce1ab57c3ec72445135a35fc@canb.auug.org.au> <201205161054.15610.arnd@arndb.de> <4FB3B1F3.6080102@atmel.com> Message-ID: <201205161433.47416.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 16 May 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > I am on the subject till this morning to figure out if the parameters > are SoC dependent. It seems that the ADC is the same between those two > platforms but the technology is different: I have to figure out the > details internally. > > I will give you a patch on top of arm-soc soon. It will replace the one > in staging-next: does it sound good to you? Ok, good. Arnd