From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
To: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NVM Mapping API
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 12:10:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120516161020.GJ22985@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337149453.1961.24.camel@slavad-ubuntu-11>
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:24:13AM +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 09:34 -0400, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > There are a number of interesting non-volatile memory (NVM) technologies
> > being developed. Some of them promise DRAM-comparable latencies and
> > bandwidths. At Intel, we've been thinking about various ways to present
> > those to software.
>
> Could you please share vision of these NVM technologies in more details?
> What capacity in bytes of of one NVM unit do we can expect? What about
> bad blocks and any other reliability issues of such NVM technologies?
No, I can't comment on any of that. This isn't about any particular piece
of technology; it's an observation that there are a lot of technologies
that seem to fit in this niche; some of them are even available to
buy today.
No statement of mine should be taken as an indication of any future
Intel product plans :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-16 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-15 13:34 NVM Mapping API Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-15 17:46 ` Greg KH
2012-05-16 15:57 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-18 12:07 ` Marco Stornelli
2012-05-15 23:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-05-16 16:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-31 17:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-05-16 6:24 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2012-05-16 16:10 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2012-05-17 9:06 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2012-05-16 21:58 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2012-05-17 19:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-16 9:52 ` James Bottomley
2012-05-16 17:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-16 19:58 ` Christian Stroetmann
2012-05-19 22:19 ` Christian Stroetmann
2012-05-17 9:54 ` James Bottomley
2012-05-17 18:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-18 9:03 ` James Bottomley
2012-05-18 10:13 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-05-18 14:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-18 15:08 ` Alan Cox
2012-05-18 15:31 ` James Bottomley
2012-05-18 17:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-16 13:04 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-05-16 18:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-18 9:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120516161020.GJ22985@linux.intel.com \
--to=willy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.