From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
To: chetan loke <loke.chetan@gmail.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: SCSI RAM driver ported to 3.3 kernel for file system and I/O testing
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 16:22:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120516202215.GO22985@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAsGZS5tzf5-aciK2kCJCHn4oDTSAvN+=FQWzkH_3PzVm5m-iA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:54:06PM -0400, chetan loke wrote:
> I thought that 'scsi_ram_device_thread' has a
> 'wait_event_interruptible' call if it sees that the list is empty. I
> don't see that call that's why the confusion. Either queuecmd or
> kthread will get the lock and so why keep the kthread spinning in that
> while loop if there's nothing to do?
It doesn't spin, it sleeps:
+ spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags);
+ if (list_empty(&ram_device->commands)) {
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
+ schedule();
+ continue;
+ }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-16 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-16 17:07 SCSI RAM driver ported to 3.3 kernel for file system and I/O testing Tim Chen
2012-05-16 17:18 ` Joe Perches
2012-05-16 19:02 ` Tim Chen
2012-05-16 17:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-05-16 19:31 ` chetan loke
2012-05-16 19:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-16 19:37 ` chetan loke
2012-05-16 19:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-16 19:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-05-16 19:54 ` chetan loke
2012-05-16 20:22 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2012-05-16 20:05 ` Tim Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120516202215.GO22985@linux.intel.com \
--to=willy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loke.chetan@gmail.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.