From: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
To: Rob Clark <rob.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: add vmap interface (v2)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:32:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120517173201.GA3209@joi.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGu+XrG4+xhr0r0XaD=15vNWjCDTu5iXfehoYJfiBui26A@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 06:32:19AM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
> > From: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
> >
> > The main requirement I have for this interface is for scanning out
> > using the USB gpu devices. Since these devices have to read the
> > framebuffer on updates and linearly compress it, using kmaps
> > is a major overhead for every update.
> >
> > v2: fix warn issues pointed out by Sylwester Nawrocki.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/dma-buf.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
> > index 07cbbc6..750f92c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
> > @@ -406,3 +406,37 @@ void dma_buf_kunmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, unsigned long page_num,
> > dmabuf->ops->kunmap(dmabuf, page_num, vaddr);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_kunmap);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * dma_buf_vmap - Create virtual mapping for the buffer object into kernel address space. The same restrictions as for vmap and friends apply.
> > + * @dma_buf: [in] buffer to vmap
> > + *
> > + * This call may fail due to lack of virtual mapping address space.
> > + * These calls are optional in drivers. The intended use for them
> > + * is for mapping objects linear in kernel space for high use objects.
> > + * Please attempt to use kmap/kunmap before thinking about these interfaces.
> > + */
> > +void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
> > +{
> > + if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + if (dmabuf->ops->vmap)
> > + return dmabuf->ops->vmap(dmabuf);
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_buf_vmap);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * dma_buf_vunmap - Unmap a vmap obtained by dma_buf_vmap.
> > + * @dma_buf: [in] buffer to vmap
> > + */
> > +void dma_buf_vunmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, void *vaddr)
> > +{
> > + if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (dmabuf->ops->vunmap)
> > + dmabuf->ops->vunmap(dmabuf, vaddr);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_buf_vunmap);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> > index 3efbfc2..b92b6de 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> > @@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ struct dma_buf_ops {
> > void (*kunmap_atomic)(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long, void *);
> > void *(*kmap)(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long);
> > void (*kunmap)(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long, void *);
> > +
> > + void *(*vmap)(struct dma_buf *);
> > + void (*vunmap)(struct dma_buf *, void *vaddr);
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -167,6 +170,9 @@ void *dma_buf_kmap_atomic(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long);
> > void dma_buf_kunmap_atomic(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long, void *);
> > void *dma_buf_kmap(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long);
> > void dma_buf_kunmap(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long, void *);
> > +
> > +void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *);
> > +void dma_buf_vunmap(struct dma_buf *, void *vaddr);
> > #else
> >
> > static inline struct dma_buf_attachment *dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> > @@ -248,6 +254,14 @@ static inline void dma_buf_kunmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> > unsigned long pnum, void *vaddr)
> > {
> > }
> > +
> > +static inline void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void dma_buf_vunmap(struct dma_buf *, void *vaddr);
> > +{
> > +}
>
> I think these two will cause compile issues for
> !CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER case due to no parameter name for first arg.
And because of ";" between ) and { :)
Marcin
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-17 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-17 10:31 [PATCH] dma-buf: add vmap interface (v2) Dave Airlie
2012-05-17 12:32 ` Rob Clark
2012-05-17 13:14 ` Dave Airlie
2012-05-17 17:32 ` Marcin Slusarz [this message]
2012-05-18 4:07 ` [Linaro-mm-sig] " Sumit Semwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120517173201.GA3209@joi.lan \
--to=marcin.slusarz@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=rob.clark@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.