From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
david.daney@cavium.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] MIPS: Octeon: convert smp_reserve_lock to raw spinlock
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 22:50:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120517205003.GE16397@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB527B2.2010800@gmail.com>
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 09:30:42AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 09:30:42 -0700
> From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
> To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>, ralf@linux-mips.org
> CC: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> david.daney@cavium.com, tglx@linutronix.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] MIPS: Octeon: convert smp_reserve_lock to raw
> spinlock
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 05/17/2012 03:15 AM, Yong Zhang wrote:
> >From: Yong Zhang<yong.zhang@windriver.com>
> >
> >Because __cpu_disable is called in atomic context and spinlock
> >is a mutex on -rt.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang<yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
> >---
> > arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c
> >index ef9c34a..473c72b 100644
> >--- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c
> >+++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c
> >@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, cpu_state);
> >
> > extern void fixup_irqs(void);
> >
> >-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(smp_reserve_lock);
> >+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(smp_reserve_lock);
> >
>
> Ralf added this in 773cb77d (MIPS: Cavium: Add CPU hotplugging code.)
>
> I'm not even sure what this lock is supposed to be protecting, so I
> would like Ralf to take a look.
>
> You can add an Acked-by: from me for either this patch as is, or if
> Ralf thinks it is OK, removing the lock entirely.
>
> In any event we can merge this via Ralf's tree.
The 773cb77d patch has a long history but I think I first worked on it for
Wind River Linux 2.0 which was 2.6.21-based, then broke it out and pushed
it upstream. In 2.6.21 it was probably infected by the the smp_reserve_lock
virus in the s390 code for no good reason. So I agree, the lock can
be dropped and I'm queueing a patch to do so for 3.5.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-17 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-17 10:15 [PATCH -rt] MIPS: Octeon: convert smp_reserve_lock to raw spinlock Yong Zhang
2012-05-17 16:30 ` David Daney
2012-05-17 20:50 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2012-05-18 2:29 ` Yong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120517205003.GE16397@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.