From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, patches@linaro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] rcu: Fix code-style issues involving "else"
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:24:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120517222407.GB15766@leaf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337292765-12221-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 03:12:44PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
>
> The Linux kernel coding style says that single-statement blocks should
> omit curly braces unless the other leg of the "if" statement has
> multiple statements, in which case the curly braces should be included.
> This commit fixes RCU's violations of this rule.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> index fc31a2d..cd9ae33 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> @@ -351,8 +351,9 @@ static int rcu_initiate_boost(void)
> rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.boost_tasks =
> rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.gp_tasks;
> invoke_rcu_callbacks();
> - } else
> + } else {
> RCU_TRACE(rcu_initiate_boost_trace());
> + }
> return 1;
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcutorture.c
> index e66b34a..d7c3cb1 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutorture.c
> @@ -407,8 +407,9 @@ rcu_torture_cb(struct rcu_head *p)
> if (++rp->rtort_pipe_count >= RCU_TORTURE_PIPE_LEN) {
> rp->rtort_mbtest = 0;
> rcu_torture_free(rp);
> - } else
> + } else {
> cur_ops->deferred_free(rp);
> + }
> }
>
> static int rcu_no_completed(void)
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 0da7b88..25874a3 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -893,8 +893,9 @@ static void __note_new_gpnum(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp, struct
> if (rnp->qsmask & rdp->grpmask) {
> rdp->qs_pending = 1;
> rdp->passed_quiesce = 0;
> - } else
> + } else {
> rdp->qs_pending = 0;
> + }
> zero_cpu_stall_ticks(rdp);
> }
> }
> @@ -2115,9 +2116,9 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
> put_online_cpus();
>
> /* No joy, try again later. Or just synchronize_sched(). */
> - if (trycount++ < 10)
> + if (trycount++ < 10) {
> udelay(trycount * num_online_cpus());
> - else {
> + } else {
> synchronize_sched();
> return;
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> index 2411000..c9b173c 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> @@ -398,8 +398,9 @@ static noinline void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
> rnp->grphi,
> !!rnp->gp_tasks);
> rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(rnp, flags);
> - } else
> + } else {
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> + }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST
> /* Unboost if we were boosted. */
> @@ -429,9 +430,9 @@ void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
> {
> struct task_struct *t = current;
>
> - if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting != 1)
> + if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting != 1) {
> --t->rcu_read_lock_nesting;
> - else {
> + } else {
> barrier(); /* critical section before exit code. */
> t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = INT_MIN;
> barrier(); /* assign before ->rcu_read_unlock_special load */
> @@ -824,9 +825,9 @@ sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
> int must_wait = 0;
>
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
> - if (list_empty(&rnp->blkd_tasks))
> + if (list_empty(&rnp->blkd_tasks)) {
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> - else {
> + } else {
> rnp->exp_tasks = rnp->blkd_tasks.next;
> rcu_initiate_boost(rnp, flags); /* releases rnp->lock */
> must_wait = 1;
> @@ -870,9 +871,9 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
> * expedited grace period for us, just leave.
> */
> while (!mutex_trylock(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex)) {
> - if (trycount++ < 10)
> + if (trycount++ < 10) {
> udelay(trycount * num_online_cpus());
> - else {
> + } else {
> synchronize_rcu();
> return;
> }
> @@ -2213,8 +2214,9 @@ static void rcu_prepare_for_idle(int cpu)
> if (rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(cpu)) {
> trace_rcu_prep_idle("More callbacks");
> invoke_rcu_core();
> - } else
> + } else {
> trace_rcu_prep_idle("Callbacks drained");
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.7.8
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-17 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-17 22:12 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/2] Code-style fixes Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-17 22:12 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] rcu: Fix code-style issues involving "else" Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-17 22:12 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/2] rcu: Fix broken strings in RCU's source code Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-17 22:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 22:32 ` Josh Triplett
2012-05-17 22:32 ` Paul Bolle
2012-05-18 6:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-18 12:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-17 22:23 ` Josh Triplett
2012-05-17 22:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-17 22:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 22:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-17 22:24 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2012-05-18 7:38 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] rcu: Fix code-style issues involving "else" Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120517222407.GB15766@leaf \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.