From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.9]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SVACD-0008Sp-1F for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 18 May 2012 01:33:25 +0200 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [108.48.117.33]) by vms173009.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0M46004IFWYI3I90@vms173009.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 17 May 2012 18:23:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD9FC201CA; Thu, 17 May 2012 19:23:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:23:06 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20120517232306.GN6829@denix.org> References: MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: meta-systemd X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 23:33:25 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:18:26PM +0200, Andreas M?ller wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Op 17-05-12 15:07, Andreas M?ller schreef: > >> Hi > >> > >> happy to see this happen I have few questions on what is planned. > >> > >> In README is written: > >> > >>> And we're working to break the dependency on this one: > >>> > >>> URI: git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded > >> > >> Maybe it is a misunderstanding but I would expect for contents of this > >> layer > >> > >> * systemd.bbclass * all from meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd * bbappends for > >> all recipes with systemd support. > >> > >> Is this correct? > > > > Correct. The bbappends will likely cause dependencies on non-oecore layers, > > but so be it. We might need to set the unbreak-me flag for missing bb files > > that match our bbappends. > > Unless people actually start reporting the bugs they encounter by including > > meta-oe... Great! Glad to see progress in this area. > Two more questions: > > 1. Has anybody patches in queue to fill meta-systemd? If not I would > stand up to prepare some. I bet Koen has patches queued up - it was on his backburner since BSP Summit we had in early April... :) -- Denys