From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <cbou@mail.ru>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: wm831x: Convert to irq_domain
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 17:39:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120518233929.75F8E3E07C8@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336943936-27999-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Sun, 13 May 2012 22:18:56 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> The modern idiom is to use irq_domain to allocate interrupts. This is
> useful partly to allow further infrastructure to be based on the domains
> and partly because it makes it much easier to allocate virtual interrupts
> to devices as we don't need to allocate a contiguous range of interrupt
> numbers.
>
> Convert the wm831x driver over to this infrastructure, using a legacy
> IRQ mapping if an irq_base is specified in platform data and otherwise
> using a linear mapping, always registering the interrupts even if they
> won't ever be used. Only boards which need to use the GPIOs as
> interrupts should need to use an irq_base.
>
> This means that we can't use the MFD irq_base management since the
> unless we're using an explicit irq_base from platform data we can't rely
> on a linear mapping of interrupts. Instead we need to map things via
> the irq_domain - provide a conveniencem function wm831x_irq() to save a
> small amount of typing when doing so. Looking at this I couldn't clearly
> see anything the MFD core could do to make this nicer.
>
> Since we're not supporting device tree yet there's no meaningful
> advantage if we don't do this conversion in one, the fact that the
> interrupt resources are used for repeated IP blocks makes accessor
> functions for the irq_domain more trouble to do than they're worth.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-18 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-13 21:18 [PATCH] mfd: wm831x: Convert to irq_domain Mark Brown
2012-05-14 21:11 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-05-18 23:39 ` Grant Likely [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120518233929.75F8E3E07C8@localhost \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=cbou@mail.ru \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
--cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.