From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: fixup infoframe support for sdvo
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 17:13:28 +0200
Message-ID: <20120520151327.GA5145@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1336846921-2294-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<CAC7Lmnv4=xWMQaQZBwhhALU6GBRU0+VEWxMPSmYO6VaSWtztDA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com
	[209.85.212.177])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC169E88C
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sun, 20 May 2012 08:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibhm14 with SMTP id hm14so1240654wib.12
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sun, 20 May 2012 08:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAC7Lmnv4=xWMQaQZBwhhALU6GBRU0+VEWxMPSmYO6VaSWtztDA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:17:36AM -0300, Eugeni Dodonov wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>wr=
ote:
> =

> > At least the worst offenders:
> > - SDVO specifies that the encoder should compute the ecc. Testing also
> >  shows that we must not send the ecc field, so copy the dip_infoframe
> >  struct to a temporay place and avoid the ecc field. This way the avi
> >  infoframe is exactly 17 bytes long, which agrees with what the spec
> >  mandates as a minimal storage capacity (with the ecc field it would
> >  be 18 bytes).
> > - Only 17 when sending the avi infoframe. The SDVO spec explicitly
> >  says that sending more data than what the device announces results
> >  in undefined behaviour.
> > - Add __attribute__((packed)) to the avi and spd infoframes, for
> >  otherwise they're wrongly aligned. Noticed because the avi infoframe
> >  ended up being 18 bytes large instead of 17. We haven't noticed this
> >  yet because we don't use the uint16_t fields yet (which are the only
> >  ones that would be wrongly aligned).
> >
> > This regression has been introduce by
> >
> > 3c17fe4b8f40a112a85758a9ab2aebf772bdd647 is the first bad commit
> > commit 3c17fe4b8f40a112a85758a9ab2aebf772bdd647
> > Author: David H=E4rdeman <david@hardeman.nu>
> > Date:   Fri Sep 24 21:44:32 2010 +0200
> >
> >    i915: enable AVI infoframe for intel_hdmi.c [v4]
> >
> > Patch tested on my g33 with a sdvo hdmi adaptor.
> >
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D25732
> > Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> >
> =

> This looks correct, and the math matches the 17 bytes we need. So for the
> patch itself:
> Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Queued for -next, thanks for the review.
-Daniel
-- =

Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48