From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Vlad Zolotarov <vlad@scalemp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Shai Fultheim (Shai@ScaleMP.com)" <Shai@scalemp.com>,
Ido Yariv <ido@wizery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86: Define early read-mostly per-cpu macros
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 14:28:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120521122859.GA17065@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10387490.kMM6uuuW2C@vlad>
* Vlad Zolotarov <vlad@scalemp.com> wrote:
> On Monday, May 21, 2012 10:46:26 AM Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Vlad Zolotarov <vlad@scalemp.com> wrote:
> > > Some read-mostly per-cpu data may need to be declared or defined early,
> > > so it can be initialized and accessed before per_cpu areas are
> > > allocated.
> > >
> > > Only the data that resides in the per_cpu areas should be read-mostly,
> > > as there is little benefit in optimizing cache lines on initialization.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov <vlad@scalemp.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ido Yariv <ido@wizery.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Shai Fultheim <shai@scalemp.com>
> >
> > That's not a valid signoff chain. If you send me a patch then
> > you should be the last SOB - but as the author you should be the
> > first SOB as well. I edited the two SOBs to be Acked-by's.
>
> Thanks, Ingo. I understand. However the "history" of this
> patch is not as simple as u represent. ;)
>
> It was originally written by Ido and I just posted it (then I
> put my SOB at the end of SOB list). But after u noted that it
> didn't compile on !SMP i reworked it but yet Ido did at least
> half of the coding, so I put my SOB at the first place (as I
> was the last one writing the code) and then Ido's as he
> actually wrote the code in this patch as well and I do wanted
> to give him a credit.
The proper way to do that is to add a "Originally-From: " tag,
or to keep him as the author (and first SOB) and desccribe your
own changes as comments between the SOBs:
Signed-off-by: Original Author
[ cleaned up the code a bit ]
Signed-off-by: Second Author
[ restructured it ]
Signed-off-by: You
> Do u still think changing his (Ido's) SOB to Acked-by was the
> right thing to do?
If they agree with it then you can send it to me that way - or
the above way, or you can add any extra authors in a copyright
notice - but the signoff chain should be a chain, with the
primary author as the first SOB and the person sending me the
patch being the last SOB.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-21 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-20 15:19 [PATCH v3 1/2] x86: Define early read-mostly per-cpu macros Vlad Zolotarov
2012-05-21 8:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 11:12 ` Vlad Zolotarov
2012-05-21 12:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-05-21 13:27 ` Vlad Zolotarov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120521122859.GA17065@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=Shai@scalemp.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ido@wizery.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vlad@scalemp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.