From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:38999 "EHLO fieldses.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751859Ab2EVSLl (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 22 May 2012 14:11:41 -0400
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 14:11:29 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Cc: Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>, "bfields@redhat.com" <bfields@redhat.com>,
        "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] SUNRPC: Add RPC based upcall mechanism for RPCGSS
 auth
Message-ID: <20120522181129.GB4697@fieldses.org>
References: <1337087550-9821-4-git-send-email-simo@redhat.com>
 <20120522124728.GB891@fieldses.org>
 <1337691607.16840.178.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org>
 <4FBB91EE.3010307@parallels.com>
 <1337692966.16840.181.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org>
 <4FBB9551.9010407@parallels.com>
 <20120522142035.GC891@fieldses.org>
 <4FBBA667.4090409@parallels.com>
 <20120522150748.GF891@fieldses.org>
 <4FBBAE81.9010708@parallels.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <4FBBAE81.9010708@parallels.com>
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 07:19:29PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> Just a reminder: abstract (is it the right name?) UNIX sockets (with
> '\0' as a first character in name) are containerized already.
> If UNIX socket is the only way. then maybe this "abstract" socket can be used?

Huh.  Reading the section on abstract addresses in unix(7)....  Maybe
that would work.  I don't quite understand the namespace.  If we fix a
name for gss-proxy to use, what's to prevent somebody else from binding
to the same name and preventing us from using it?

--b.