From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: William Thompson <wt@electro-mechanical.com>
Subject: raid 10f2 vs 1 on 2 drives
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 15:33:40 -0400
Message-ID: <20120522193340.GM27769@electro-mechanical.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

I understand that raid 10 f2 is slower on writes due to the location of the
2nd copy.  My question is, if lots of writes are performed, could this
layout wearout the drives quicker than raid 1?