From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755171Ab2EWGMl (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2012 02:12:41 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:41946 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755014Ab2EWGMk (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2012 02:12:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 23:12:16 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Joe Perches Cc: Kay Sievers , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] driver core patches for 3.5-rc1 - try 2 Message-ID: <20120523061216.GA19584@kroah.com> References: <1337723927.9270.15.camel@joe2Laptop> <20120522220534.GC12705@kroah.com> <1337724736.11918.8.camel@joe2Laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1337724736.11918.8.camel@joe2Laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 03:12:16PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 15:05 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:58:47PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > How is it really better that what is available now? > > > > > > Perhaps it would be better to respin all the > > > printk modifications without adding [v]printk_emit > > > and have the [v]printk_emit bits debated a bit more. > > > > I'm always glad to review patches, but to just propose something that > > works to be reverted without a patch to replace the functionality, isn't > > ok. > > It hasn't been committed yet in anything other than > -next. > > Lots of stuff gets committed there and later removed > and hits Linus' mainline tree. Sorry, but as people are "downstream" for me, I do not rebase my trees, unless something really bad happened (i.e. I messed up the tree). So this will not happen, sorry. Also, the patches are all in Linus's tree now, so the point is moot. thanks, greg k-h