From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= <pasik@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: V4V
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 13:19:56 +0300
Message-ID: <20120525101956.GA2058@reaktio.net>
References: <CAEBdQ92fHcGvKvsVHq8ypNS4TEg2TGPEdkhkySDW_jx1EYz+6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAEBdQ92fHcGvKvsVHq8ypNS4TEg2TGPEdkhkySDW_jx1EYz+6Q@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jean Guyader <jean.guyader@gmail.com>
Cc: James McKenzie <James.McKenzie@citrix.com>, Ross Philipson <Ross.Philipson@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:23:19PM +0100, Jean Guyader wrote:
> 
>    Reasons why the V4V method is quite good even though it does memory
>    copies:
>        - Memory transfer speeds through the FSB in modern chipsets is quite
>          fast. Speeds on the order of 10-12 Gb/s (over say 2 DRAM channels)
>          can be realized.
>

Hello,

I just wanted to ask for clarification..
Did you mean 10-12 Gbit/sec or 10-12 GB (GigaBytes) per second? 

Thanks,

-- Pasi