All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: tty_mutex: fix lockdep warning in tty_lock_pair(v1)
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 14:47:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120525144713.6946df1e@bob.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337952533.9783.195.camel@laptop>

> Having looked at the source I still don't see how it could possibly
> work,.. So the problem with tty_release() -> tty_ldisc_release() is
> that tty_ldisc_release() does an unlock/lock of tty.

Yes it should do the pair, see the patch I posted restructing it, and
the second one restructing it right.

> However your tty_lock_pair() can still result in tty being subclass 1,
> see your else branch, nested case.
> 
> That said, how is this not a real deadlock? If you rely on tty pointer
> ordering to avoid deadlocks, you always need to lock them in the same
> order. The unlock+lock in ldisc_release violates that.

Which was a bug.

Alan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-25 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-22  1:58 [PATCH] tty: tty_mutex: fix lockdep warning in tty_lock_pair(v1) Ming Lei
2012-05-23  6:01 ` Ming Lei
2012-05-25 13:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-25 13:39     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-25 13:47     ` Alan Cox [this message]
2012-05-25 13:52       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-25 14:01         ` Alan Cox
2012-05-25 14:08           ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120525144713.6946df1e@bob.linux.org.uk \
    --to=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.