From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753159Ab2E0RDD (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 May 2012 13:03:03 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:2495 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750815Ab2E0RDA (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 May 2012 13:03:00 -0400 Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 19:02:48 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [ 00/91] 3.4.1-stable review Message-ID: <20120527170248.GD10168@1wt.eu> References: <20120527010903.GA18244@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120527010903.GA18244@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 10:09:03AM +0900, Greg KH wrote: > Note, I've tested this release a bit differently than I have in the > past. For this release, I've only tested it on one machine, my laptop, > with a pretty minimal configuration to save on build times. That means, > while this release works for me, it might not for you, and it might not > even build at all for you. Please test to verify that I haven't messed > anything up. I'll give everyone at least an extra day than "normal" for > this review cycle before I cut a final 3.4.1 release. I've tested it here too on my netbook (atom N270). Tested video (i915), ethernet (atl1c), Wifi (ath9k), NFS, suspend. Nothing suspicious to report and it built without any issues. Good job! Willy