From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58278)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alevy@redhat.com>) id 1SZ07a-0001L0-Se
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 09:36:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alevy@redhat.com>) id 1SZ07Z-0006Bp-6c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 09:36:30 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38696)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alevy@redhat.com>) id 1SZ07Y-0006Bg-V5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 09:36:29 -0400
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4SDaRCt029264
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 28 May 2012 09:36:27 -0400
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 16:36:16 +0300
From: Alon Levy <alevy@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20120528133616.GK8353@garlic>
References: <20120524151905.GQ6105@garlic.tlv.redhat.com>
	<1337876572-2051-1-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com>
	<20120525114311.1c1acf03@doriath.home>
	<20120528090813.GE8353@garlic>
	<20120528101328.4f936301@doriath.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120528101328.4f936301@doriath.home>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] hmp/qxl: info spice: add qxl info
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: kraxel@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:13:28AM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Mon, 28 May 2012 12:08:13 +0300
> Alon Levy <alevy@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:43:11AM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:22:52 +0300
> > > Alon Levy <alevy@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > For all devices print id, mode and guest_bug status.
> > > 
> > > Is qxl really tied to spice? In the meaning that it's impossible to use it
> > > without spice? Wouldn't it be better to have 'info display' instead?
> > 
> > Would a patch implementing 'info display' require me to implement it for
> > all displays?
> 
> Would be nice, even if we start with very basic information.

How would that work? I have QXLInfo that only makes sense when the
information is about a qxl device. Can't have opaque data in a QMP
response, so would this be a "info display qxl" "info display cirrus"
etc. or "info qxl"?