diff for duplicates of <20120530101326.GF9947@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 56e245e..68c4036 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:05:31PM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote: > On 30 May 2012 17:34, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote: -> > Right, and there's no problem at all with using the name. The thing is +> > Right, and there's no problem at all with using the name. ?The thing is > > that there's no need to set the name at runtime since the struct device > > being configured is always going to end up with the same name and doing -> > so is just causing confusion. The device being registered is specific +> > so is just causing confusion. ?The device being registered is specific > > to the SoC already so setting the SoC name at runtime isn't needed. > I think I did not understand your point. There is only one instance of @@ -16,3 +16,10 @@ that are passed in for memory mapping, DMA and interrupt vary with the SoC). The bit of code I was querying just changes "s3c64xx-spi" to "s3c6410-spi" at runtime in that structure which seems like a waste of time. +-------------- next part -------------- +A non-text attachment was scrubbed... +Name: signature.asc +Type: application/pgp-signature +Size: 836 bytes +Desc: Digital signature +URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120530/d71b632c/attachment-0001.sig> diff --git a/a/2.bin b/a/2.bin deleted file mode 100644 index 5d75210..0000000 --- a/a/2.bin +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ ------BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- -Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) - -iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPxfK/AAoJEBus8iNuMP3dq5wP/jTlK1sThAap4v5QkMmHNDu/ -OQ970m7KCRF15PVCRQul2mLgpoQ9o7lBBbAQGY3/VL+kDqT7BuSiQfkkUTe0hKys -0IiAb+cIv2WlMlH6pcCQyhfpEpLEQUPc263Q1ug0hgNdulnIC9lpx5m6k7gonmWV -WTW366mV230ANamEeRd2UXaX50sR+Z3nvykZAre86sTRPfgguJkUjlhwuCBxzHDx -QJYRYcRQg4NsBH8mSzwHwHT1jqe5W4jBYX+8YUQ85OlMZIjVUX7f+XSUJaedCpf3 -kyvnA37Jrewd6DhRlRvBQS2Wix1v6ckJpXMQj04WXKehdf4LdP/2lZLlB31LD+lA -GK8txsf/eB8beKw/DOISTevKT4B2ZsU0eiM8wNA+Ah4j5Mjspoazjk2Zx2sKsn9s -tcBlca7RyJw4ACiPpDsF5nwXr3jxT3fUPtSLjdZGpxzd9bwv0Ydh3wlGDjaBVZCg -PI1IR1EaJoNaJqFJ0CZBTscLFEvIaxgo3bok/6nRXX1dNuvt11oEeYXblD8v7GEB -QyXvCIfpalwYiBeadcsYh1MAslOLHwqrIQELIWz4d599EAsZwv5soLq2GZ2AqVJN -u0tvDjTRzjZdwknSc8/klxO/wVL5YvpGsYTg1JC/0YgVb24gAF/G/mgCOJC/2pQW -9Hej8/z2FWFzMeJc4Yy4 -=lR1x ------END PGP SIGNATURE----- diff --git a/a/2.hdr b/a/2.hdr deleted file mode 100644 index 3237378..0000000 --- a/a/2.hdr +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2 +0,0 @@ -Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -Content-Description: Digital signature diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index fbed0e0..f2111d3 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -4,28 +4,19 @@ "ref\0CAOesGMhFcdv7QW=_1U8HHfaETD83mJt=Dgk-8z40yOrC3PB_fA@mail.gmail.com\0" "ref\020120530093421.GA9947@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com\0" "ref\0CAJuYYwShLhKSrpGhaTyxX4dqaiKDAcjBtuWSMYAdsWcOMfP=qw@mail.gmail.com\0" - "From\0Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] ARM: Samsung: Modify s3c64xx_spi{0|1|2}_set_platdata function\0" + "From\0broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH v2 4/6] ARM: Samsung: Modify s3c64xx_spi{0|1|2}_set_platdata function\0" "Date\0Wed, 30 May 2012 11:13:26 +0100\0" - "To\0Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>\0" - "Cc\0Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>" - spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net - devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org - linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org - rob.herring@calxeda.com - grant.likely@secretlab.ca - kgene.kim@samsung.com - " jaswinder.singh@linaro.org\0" - "\01:1\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:05:31PM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote:\n" "> On 30 May 2012 17:34, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:\n" "\n" - "> > Right, and there's no problem at all with using the name. \302\240The thing is\n" + "> > Right, and there's no problem at all with using the name. ?The thing is\n" "> > that there's no need to set the name at runtime since the struct device\n" "> > being configured is always going to end up with the same name and doing\n" - "> > so is just causing confusion. \302\240The device being registered is specific\n" + "> > so is just causing confusion. ?The device being registered is specific\n" "> > to the SoC already so setting the SoC name at runtime isn't needed.\n" "\n" "> I think I did not understand your point. There is only one instance of\n" @@ -36,27 +27,13 @@ "that are passed in for memory mapping, DMA and interrupt vary with the\n" "SoC). The bit of code I was querying just changes \"s3c64xx-spi\" to\n" "\"s3c6410-spi\" at runtime in that structure which seems like a waste of\n" - time. - "\01:2\0" - "fn\0signature.asc\0" - "d\0Digital signature\0" - "b\0" - "-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\n" - "Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\n" - "\n" - "iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPxfK/AAoJEBus8iNuMP3dq5wP/jTlK1sThAap4v5QkMmHNDu/\n" - "OQ970m7KCRF15PVCRQul2mLgpoQ9o7lBBbAQGY3/VL+kDqT7BuSiQfkkUTe0hKys\n" - "0IiAb+cIv2WlMlH6pcCQyhfpEpLEQUPc263Q1ug0hgNdulnIC9lpx5m6k7gonmWV\n" - "WTW366mV230ANamEeRd2UXaX50sR+Z3nvykZAre86sTRPfgguJkUjlhwuCBxzHDx\n" - "QJYRYcRQg4NsBH8mSzwHwHT1jqe5W4jBYX+8YUQ85OlMZIjVUX7f+XSUJaedCpf3\n" - "kyvnA37Jrewd6DhRlRvBQS2Wix1v6ckJpXMQj04WXKehdf4LdP/2lZLlB31LD+lA\n" - "GK8txsf/eB8beKw/DOISTevKT4B2ZsU0eiM8wNA+Ah4j5Mjspoazjk2Zx2sKsn9s\n" - "tcBlca7RyJw4ACiPpDsF5nwXr3jxT3fUPtSLjdZGpxzd9bwv0Ydh3wlGDjaBVZCg\n" - "PI1IR1EaJoNaJqFJ0CZBTscLFEvIaxgo3bok/6nRXX1dNuvt11oEeYXblD8v7GEB\n" - "QyXvCIfpalwYiBeadcsYh1MAslOLHwqrIQELIWz4d599EAsZwv5soLq2GZ2AqVJN\n" - "u0tvDjTRzjZdwknSc8/klxO/wVL5YvpGsYTg1JC/0YgVb24gAF/G/mgCOJC/2pQW\n" - "9Hej8/z2FWFzMeJc4Yy4\n" - "=lR1x\n" - "-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\n" + "time.\n" + "-------------- next part --------------\n" + "A non-text attachment was scrubbed...\n" + "Name: signature.asc\n" + "Type: application/pgp-signature\n" + "Size: 836 bytes\n" + "Desc: Digital signature\n" + URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120530/d71b632c/attachment-0001.sig> -05bc0fb152625dcac79986fc847eed2f91b192563ee228cffbfe008dd742dbde +fe2123059e7e0d34889fbc4aa977b6701a3b052382fa25b61781e2e5427ca260
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.