From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix relax_domain_level interface
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:44:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120605184436.GA15668@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338921419.2749.31.camel@twins>
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:36:59PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 13:34 -0500, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> >
> > I'll submit a patch shortly that should return these back to what appears to
> > be their intended functionality.
>
> I guess removing the max check in the paramater parsing is the easiest
> thing.
My thoughts exactly.
Fix the relax_domain_level boot parameter. It does not get processed because
sched_domain_level_max is 0 at the time that setup_relax_domain_level()
is run. Simply accept the value as it is, as we don't know the value
of sched_domain_level_max until sched domain construction is completed.
Fix sched_relax_domain_level in cpuset. The build_sched_domain() routine calls
the set_domain_attribute() routine prior to setting the sd->level, however,
the set_domain_attribute() routine relies on the sd->level to decide whether
idle load balancing will be off/on.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: linux/kernel/sched/core.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ linux/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6165,11 +6165,8 @@ int sched_domain_level_max;
static int __init setup_relax_domain_level(char *str)
{
- unsigned long val;
-
- val = simple_strtoul(str, NULL, 0);
- if (val < sched_domain_level_max)
- default_relax_domain_level = val;
+ if (kstrtoint(str, 0, &default_relax_domain_level))
+ pr_warn("Unable to set relax_domain_level\n");
return 1;
}
@@ -6543,7 +6540,6 @@ struct sched_domain *build_sched_domain(
if (!sd)
return child;
- set_domain_attribute(sd, attr);
cpumask_and(sched_domain_span(sd), cpu_map, tl->mask(cpu));
if (child) {
sd->level = child->level + 1;
@@ -6551,6 +6547,7 @@ struct sched_domain *build_sched_domain(
child->parent = sd;
}
sd->child = child;
+ set_domain_attribute(sd, attr);
return sd;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-05 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-01 21:03 relax_domain_level boot parameter has no effect Dimitri Sivanich
2012-06-04 15:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-04 18:16 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-06-05 18:34 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-06-05 18:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 18:44 ` Dimitri Sivanich [this message]
2012-06-06 16:01 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix the relax_domain_level boot parameter tip-bot for Dimitri Sivanich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120605184436.GA15668@sgi.com \
--to=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.