From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 04:29:30 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH RFC] hwmon: (coretemp) Improve support for TjMax detection on Atom CPUs Message-Id: <20120606042930.GA19356@ericsson.com> List-Id: References: <1338827851-702-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: <1338827851-702-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 12:15:52AM -0400, R, Durgadoss wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > [snip.] > > > I don't have any public specification as such. I use the same platform for testing. > > > There it says TjMax is 90 (which corresponds to cpu model 0x27). > > > This is the patch that Jean has submitted a couple of days ago. > > > > > Hi Durga, > > > > sorry, you lost me. What do you mean with "there" ? If it is what coretemp > > reports, > > it is just a wild guess, unless you or Jean know better from some document. > > It is what coretemp reports. > I know it is 90C, from an internal document, though :-( > That's why was asking is there a place where I can ask folks to update. > That is easy - we can add it to Documentation/hwmon/coretemp. I'll do that with my series of patches. > > > > > Guenter, Could you please give me website link where you are getting details > > on > > > TjMax for other platforms ? I will try and see if I can make people add the > > > 'Atom platform' details also there. > > > > > > > Usually it is in the device datasheet / specification or the device thermal guide > > if it exists. I don't think there is a single web site with all the information, > > or at least I don't know one. Problem is that no such documentation seems to > > exist, > > at least not in public, for the Z2460 (or CE4100, for that matter). Only reason > > for mentioning CE4100 is that someone suggested a patch for it a couple of years > > ago, > > but it went nowhere, presumably since tjmax (supposedly 110 C) was never > > confirmed, > > nor are there well defined means to detect it. > > > > I will see if I can talk to people to see what can be done better here. > I will try & try & try.. :-) > Thanks! Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors