From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 10:10:16 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Artem Bityutskiy Subject: Re: [CFT 09/11] mtd: omap2: add DMA engine support Message-ID: <20120607171015.GK12766@atomide.com> References: <20120607110610.GB15973@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1339073375.6875.102.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20120607131158.GC15973@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1339075683.6875.109.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1339075683.6875.109.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Russell King - ARM Linux , David Woodhouse , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , * Artem Bityutskiy [120607 06:28]: > On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:11 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > No, it makes sense to get this stuff via a single tree all together, > > because, as you can see from the thread structure, it isn't purely > > an OMAP thing. > > > > The OMAP stuff depends on a core set, as does a bunch of PL08x and > > SA11x0 changes. We can't stuff all that through the OMAP tree, that > > wouldn't make any sense. > > > > What probably should happen is that the tip of the OMAP stuff gets > > pulled by Tony into his tree, and we share those commits between my > > tree and his - and then it doesn't matter what goes in when and by > > whom. > > Oh, sure, sorry, I actually wanted to say that these to patches should > _not_ got via the MTD tree. What Russell is suggesting works good for me. Regards, Tony From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [CFT 09/11] mtd: omap2: add DMA engine support Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 10:10:16 -0700 Message-ID: <20120607171015.GK12766@atomide.com> References: <20120607110610.GB15973@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1339073375.6875.102.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20120607131158.GC15973@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1339075683.6875.109.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:21143 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754204Ab2FGRKW (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 13:10:22 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1339075683.6875.109.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Artem Bityutskiy Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse * Artem Bityutskiy [120607 06:28]: > On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:11 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > No, it makes sense to get this stuff via a single tree all together, > > because, as you can see from the thread structure, it isn't purely > > an OMAP thing. > > > > The OMAP stuff depends on a core set, as does a bunch of PL08x and > > SA11x0 changes. We can't stuff all that through the OMAP tree, that > > wouldn't make any sense. > > > > What probably should happen is that the tip of the OMAP stuff gets > > pulled by Tony into his tree, and we share those commits between my > > tree and his - and then it doesn't matter what goes in when and by > > whom. > > Oh, sure, sorry, I actually wanted to say that these to patches should > _not_ got via the MTD tree. What Russell is suggesting works good for me. Regards, Tony From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 10:10:16 -0700 Subject: [CFT 09/11] mtd: omap2: add DMA engine support In-Reply-To: <1339075683.6875.109.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> References: <20120607110610.GB15973@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1339073375.6875.102.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20120607131158.GC15973@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1339075683.6875.109.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Message-ID: <20120607171015.GK12766@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Artem Bityutskiy [120607 06:28]: > On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:11 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > No, it makes sense to get this stuff via a single tree all together, > > because, as you can see from the thread structure, it isn't purely > > an OMAP thing. > > > > The OMAP stuff depends on a core set, as does a bunch of PL08x and > > SA11x0 changes. We can't stuff all that through the OMAP tree, that > > wouldn't make any sense. > > > > What probably should happen is that the tip of the OMAP stuff gets > > pulled by Tony into his tree, and we share those commits between my > > tree and his - and then it doesn't matter what goes in when and by > > whom. > > Oh, sure, sorry, I actually wanted to say that these to patches should > _not_ got via the MTD tree. What Russell is suggesting works good for me. Regards, Tony