From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, tarbal@gmail.com,
rkagan@parallels.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, bruce.w.allan@intel.com,
carolyn.wyborny@intel.com, donald.c.skidmore@intel.com,
gregory.v.rose@intel.com, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com,
alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, john.ronciak@intel.com,
dnelson@redhat.com, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000: save skb counts in TX to avoid cache misses
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:15:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120608021542.GA10112@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120607.144358.1732928576389957779.davem@davemloft.net>
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:43:58PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Kirsher <tarbal@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:38:17 -0700
>
> > Thanks! I have applied the patch to my queue
>
> Why?
>
> My impression is that this is a patch already in the tree, and it's
> being submitted for -stable but such minor performance hacks are
> absolutely not appropriate for -stable submission.
The patch description says it is fixing reported oopses, but the
Subject: isn't all that helpful there.
So which is this? Should I accept it for a stable release or not?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-08 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-07 12:49 [PATCH] e1000: save skb counts in TX to avoid cache misses Roman Kagan
2012-06-07 21:38 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-06-07 21:43 ` David Miller
2012-06-07 22:02 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-06-07 22:02 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-06-08 2:15 ` Greg KH [this message]
2012-06-08 7:37 ` Roman Kagan
2012-06-08 7:37 ` Roman Kagan
2012-06-08 7:37 ` Roman Kagan
2012-06-13 11:12 ` Roman Kagan
2012-06-13 11:12 ` Roman Kagan
2012-06-13 11:12 ` Roman Kagan
2012-06-14 22:30 ` Greg KH
2012-06-14 22:30 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120608021542.GA10112@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
--cc=carolyn.wyborny@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dnelson@redhat.com \
--cc=donald.c.skidmore@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=gregory.v.rose@intel.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
--cc=rkagan@parallels.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tarbal@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.