From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS regression in v3.5-rc1: mount.nfs yells about incorrect mount option
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:33:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120608133317.GW12795@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FD1FC02.2000608@netapp.com>
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:20:02AM -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 09:03 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:54:24AM -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
> >> On 06/07/2012 11:50 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >>> mount -o nfsvers=3 ...
> >>
> >> What about `mount -o vers=4 ...`? I'm compiling a kernel right now to
> >> see if I can reproduce this, what NFS .config options do you have set?
> >> (`cat .config | grep CONFIG_NFS_` should be good enough).
> >
> > Okay, I tracked it down somewhat. The problem is that the nfs-version
> > is not set in my case so that data->version in nfs_init_server is 0. The
> > function returns -EPROTONOSUPPORT in this case which causes the mount
> > to fail. The evil commit is db8333519 and reverting it fixes the issue
> > for me. Patch attached.
>
> Thanks! I wasn't able to reproduce this on Ubuntu 12.04, so now I'm
> setting up 10.04 to see if that makes a difference. I'd like to
> understand what's going on (and why my other patch didn't fix this
> problem) before reverting.
Your other patch only touched the nfs4 path, but in my setup nfs3 was in
use. Therefore the patch didn't help. I just figured out that
nfs_fs_mount is shared between nfs23 and nfs4, so the first patch
probably breaks nfs4. I send another one which takes this into account.
Regards,
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-08 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-07 15:04 NFS regression in v3.5-rc1: mount.nfs yells about incorrect mount option Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 15:12 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-07 15:17 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-07 15:43 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 15:31 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 15:50 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 15:54 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-07 16:01 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 17:23 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-07 19:33 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-08 13:03 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-08 13:20 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-08 13:33 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2012-06-08 13:37 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-08 13:49 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-08 15:28 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-08 13:30 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120608133317.GW12795@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bjschuma@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.