From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 RFC 0/2] kvm: direct msix injection
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:07:03 -0300
Message-ID: <20120612230703.GE1973@amt.cnet>
References: <cover.1339413436.git.mst@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4771 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752683Ab2FLXHI (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:07:08 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cover.1339413436.git.mst@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:19:17PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> We can deliver certain interrupts, notably MSIX,
> from atomic context.
> Here's an untested patch to do this (compiled only).
> 
> Changes from v2:
> Don't inject broadcast interrupts directly
> Changes from v1:
> Tried to address comments from v1, except unifying
> with kvm_set_irq: passing flags to it looks too ugly.
> Added a comment.
> 
> Jan, you said you can test this?

Looks fine to me (except the unlikely). Avi/Gleb?