From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:48:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from h9.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.9]:44841 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1903750Ab2FMNsI (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:48:08 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (h5.dl5rb.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5DDm4WI006829; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:48:05 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5DDm2du006818; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:48:02 +0100 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:48:01 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Jonas Gorski Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Maxime Bizon , Florian Fainelli , Kevin Cernekee Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] MIPS: BCM63XX: move flash registration out of board_bcm963xx.c Message-ID: <20120613134801.GA5516@linux-mips.org> References: <1339489425-19037-1-git-send-email-jonas.gorski@gmail.com> <1339489425-19037-2-git-send-email-jonas.gorski@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1339489425-19037-2-git-send-email-jonas.gorski@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-archive-position: 33622 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips Return-Path: On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:23:38AM +0200, Jonas Gorski wrote: > board_bcm963xx.c is already large enough. And the grand cure for that sort of issue is FDT - we by now have built big deserts of code just registering platform devices like this.. See John Crispin's Lantiq work or David's Cavium code for FDT examples. > +int __init bcm63xx_flash_register(void) > +{ > + u32 val; > + > + /* read base address of boot chip select (0) */ > + val = bcm_mpi_readl(MPI_CSBASE_REG(0)); > + val &= MPI_CSBASE_BASE_MASK; > + > + mtd_resources[0].start = val; > + mtd_resources[0].end = 0x1FFFFFFF; > + > + return platform_device_register(&mtd_dev); > +} > diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-bcm63xx/bcm63xx_dev_flash.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-bcm63xx/bcm63xx_dev_flash.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..8dcb541 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-bcm63xx/bcm63xx_dev_flash.h > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > +#ifndef __BCM63XX_FLASH_H > +#define __BCM63XX_FLASH_H > + > +int __init bcm63xx_flash_register(void); Don't use __init in declarations. It doesn't make any difference to the compiler but it may cause build errors if has not been included before which this file doesn't. > +#endif /* __BCM63XX_FLASH_H */ I suggest to make bcm63xx_flash_register an arch_initcall. It already is being called indirectly from an bcm63xx_flash_register() so this would allow making the function static, get rid of bcm63xx_dev_flash.h which only exists to silence checkpatch warnings and make board_register_devices a little cleaner. Ralf PS: Don't forget about FDT :-) Eventually, not necessarily now.