From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] netfilter: regard users as refcount for l4proto's per-net data
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:03:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120614180326.GC10633@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339668445-23848-4-git-send-email-gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 06:07:19PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> Now, nf_proto_net's users is confusing.
> we should regard it as the refcount for l4proto's per-net data,
> because maybe there are two l4protos use the same per-net data.
>
> so increment pn->users when nf_conntrack_l4proto_register
> success, and decrement it for nf_conntrack_l4_unregister case.
>
> because nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv[4|6] don't use the same per-net
> data,so we don't need to add a refcnt for their per-net data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c
> index c9df1b4..63f9430 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c
> @@ -39,16 +39,13 @@ static int
> nf_ct_register_sysctl(struct net *net,
> struct ctl_table_header **header,
> const char *path,
> - struct ctl_table *table,
> - unsigned int *users)
> + struct ctl_table *table)
> {
> if (*header == NULL) {
> *header = register_net_sysctl(net, path, table);
> if (*header == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> - if (users != NULL)
> - (*users)++;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -58,7 +55,7 @@ nf_ct_unregister_sysctl(struct ctl_table_header **header,
> struct ctl_table **table,
> unsigned int *users)
> {
> - if (users != NULL && --*users > 0)
> + if (users != NULL && *users > 0)
> return;
>
> unregister_net_sysctl_table(*header);
> @@ -191,8 +188,7 @@ static int nf_ct_l3proto_register_sysctl(struct net *net,
> err = nf_ct_register_sysctl(net,
> &in->ctl_table_header,
> l3proto->ctl_table_path,
> - in->ctl_table,
> - NULL);
> + in->ctl_table);
>
> if (err < 0) {
> kfree(in->ctl_table);
> @@ -330,20 +326,17 @@ static struct nf_proto_net *nf_ct_l4proto_net(struct net *net,
>
> static
> int nf_ct_l4proto_register_sysctl(struct net *net,
> + struct nf_proto_net *pn,
> struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto)
> {
> int err = 0;
> - struct nf_proto_net *pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net, l4proto);
> - if (pn == NULL)
> - return 0;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> if (pn->ctl_table != NULL) {
> err = nf_ct_register_sysctl(net,
> &pn->ctl_table_header,
> "net/netfilter",
> - pn->ctl_table,
> - &pn->users);
> + pn->ctl_table);
> if (err < 0) {
> if (!pn->users) {
> kfree(pn->ctl_table);
> @@ -357,8 +350,7 @@ int nf_ct_l4proto_register_sysctl(struct net *net,
> err = nf_ct_register_sysctl(net,
> &pn->ctl_compat_header,
> "net/ipv4/netfilter",
> - pn->ctl_compat_table,
> - NULL);
> + pn->ctl_compat_table);
> if (err == 0)
> goto out;
> nf_ct_kfree_compat_sysctl_table(pn);
> @@ -374,11 +366,9 @@ out:
>
> static
> void nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(struct net *net,
> + struct nf_proto_net *pn,
> struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto)
> {
> - struct nf_proto_net *pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net, l4proto);
> - if (pn == NULL)
> - return;
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> if (pn->ctl_table_header != NULL)
> nf_ct_unregister_sysctl(&pn->ctl_table_header,
> @@ -391,8 +381,6 @@ void nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(struct net *net,
> &pn->ctl_compat_table,
> NULL);
> #endif /* CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_PROC_COMPAT */
> -#else
> - pn->users--;
> #endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */
> }
>
> @@ -458,22 +446,33 @@ int nf_conntrack_l4proto_register(struct net *net,
> struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> +
> + struct nf_proto_net *pn = NULL;
> +
> if (l4proto->init_net) {
> ret = l4proto->init_net(net, l4proto->l3proto);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto out;
> }
>
> - ret = nf_ct_l4proto_register_sysctl(net, l4proto);
> + pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net, l4proto);
> + if (pn == NULL)
> + goto out;
> +
> + ret = nf_ct_l4proto_register_sysctl(net, pn, l4proto);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto out;
>
> if (net == &init_net) {
> ret = nf_conntrack_l4proto_register_net(l4proto);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, l4proto);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, pn, l4proto);
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
> -
> + /* increase the nf_proto_net's refcnt */
this comment is superfluous, please remove it.
> + pn->users++;
> +out:
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_l4proto_register);
> @@ -498,10 +497,18 @@ nf_conntrack_l4proto_unregister_net(struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto)
> void nf_conntrack_l4proto_unregister(struct net *net,
> struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto)
> {
> + struct nf_proto_net *pn = NULL;
> if (net == &init_net)
> nf_conntrack_l4proto_unregister_net(l4proto);
>
> - nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, l4proto);
> + pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net, l4proto);
> + if (pn == NULL)
> + return;
> +
> + /* decrease the nf_proto_net's refcnt */
same thing.
> + pn->users--;
> + nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, pn, l4proto);
> +
> /* Remove all contrack entries for this protocol */
> rtnl_lock();
> nf_ct_iterate_cleanup(net, kill_l4proto, l4proto);
> @@ -513,11 +520,14 @@ int nf_conntrack_proto_init(struct net *net)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> int err;
> + struct nf_proto_net *pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net,
> + &nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic);
break lines at 80 chars per column.
> err = nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic.init_net(net,
> nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic.l3proto);
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
> err = nf_ct_l4proto_register_sysctl(net,
> + pn,
> &nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic);
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
> @@ -527,13 +537,21 @@ int nf_conntrack_proto_init(struct net *net)
> rcu_assign_pointer(nf_ct_l3protos[i],
> &nf_conntrack_l3proto_generic);
> }
> + /* increase generic proto's nf_proto_net refcnt */
> + pn->users++;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> void nf_conntrack_proto_fini(struct net *net)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> + struct nf_proto_net *pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net,
> + &nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic);
> + /* decrease generic proto's nf_proto_net refcnt */
> + pn->users--;
> nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net,
> + pn,
> &nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic);
> if (net == &init_net) {
> /* free l3proto protocol tables */
> --
> 1.7.7.6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-14 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-14 10:07 [PATCH 01/10] netfilter: fix problem with proto register Gao feng
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 02/10] netfilter: add parameter proto for l4proto.init_net Gao feng
2012-06-14 17:59 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-15 1:38 ` Gao feng
2012-06-15 10:10 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-15 10:49 ` Gao feng
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 03/10] netfilter: add nf_ct_kfree_compat_sysctl_table to make codes clear Gao feng
2012-06-14 18:06 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-15 1:36 ` Gao feng
2012-06-15 10:08 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 04/10] netfilter: regard users as refcount for l4proto's per-net data Gao feng
2012-06-14 18:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 05/10] netfilter: merge tcpv[4,6]_net_init into tcp_net_init Gao feng
2012-06-15 11:44 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-15 12:30 ` Gao feng
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 06/10] merge udpv[4,6]_net_init into udp_net_init Gao feng
2012-06-14 18:13 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 07/10] netfilter: nf_conntrack_l4proto_udplite[4,6] cleanup Gao feng
2012-06-14 18:17 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 08/10] netfilter: merge sctpv[4,6]_net_init into sctp_net_init Gao feng
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 09/10] netfilter: nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic cleanup Gao feng
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 10/10] netfilter: nf_conntrack_l4proto_dccp[4,6] cleanup Gao feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120614180326.GC10633@1984 \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.