From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, patches@linaro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Place pointer to call_rcu() in rcu_data structure
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:08:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120615220824.GX31184@leaf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339794370-28119-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:05:59PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
>
> This is a preparatory commit for increasing rcu_barrier()'s concurrency.
> It adds a pointer in the rcu_data structure to the corresponding call_rcu()
> function. This allows a pointer to the rcu_data structure to imply the
> function pointer, which allows _rcu_barrier() state to be placed in the
> rcu_state structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> kernel/rcutree.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
> kernel/rcutree.h | 2 ++
> kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 5 +++--
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 8ce1b1d..8b3ab4e 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -62,8 +62,9 @@
>
> static struct lock_class_key rcu_node_class[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
>
> -#define RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(sname) { \
> +#define RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(sname, cr) { \
> .level = { &sname##_state.node[0] }, \
> + .call = cr, \
> .fqs_state = RCU_GP_IDLE, \
> .gpnum = -300, \
> .completed = -300, \
> @@ -76,10 +77,11 @@ static struct lock_class_key rcu_node_class[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
> .name = #sname, \
> }
>
> -struct rcu_state rcu_sched_state = RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_sched);
> +struct rcu_state rcu_sched_state =
> + RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_sched, call_rcu_sched);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_sched_data);
>
> -struct rcu_state rcu_bh_state = RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_bh);
> +struct rcu_state rcu_bh_state = RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_bh, call_rcu_bh);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_bh_data);
>
> static struct rcu_state *rcu_state;
> @@ -2279,21 +2281,17 @@ static void rcu_barrier_func(void *type)
> {
> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> struct rcu_head *head = &per_cpu(rcu_barrier_head, cpu);
> - void (*call_rcu_func)(struct rcu_head *head,
> - void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
> + struct rcu_state *rsp = type;
>
> atomic_inc(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count);
> - call_rcu_func = type;
> - call_rcu_func(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
> + rsp->call(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
> }
>
> /*
> * Orchestrate the specified type of RCU barrier, waiting for all
> * RCU callbacks of the specified type to complete.
> */
> -static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp,
> - void (*call_rcu_func)(struct rcu_head *head,
> - void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head)))
> +static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> {
> int cpu;
> unsigned long flags;
> @@ -2345,8 +2343,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp,
> while (cpu_is_offline(cpu) && ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen))
> schedule_timeout_interruptible(1);
> } else if (ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen)) {
> - smp_call_function_single(cpu, rcu_barrier_func,
> - (void *)call_rcu_func, 1);
> + smp_call_function_single(cpu, rcu_barrier_func, rsp, 1);
> preempt_enable();
> } else {
> preempt_enable();
> @@ -2367,7 +2364,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp,
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->onofflock, flags);
> atomic_inc(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count);
> smp_mb__after_atomic_inc(); /* Ensure atomic_inc() before callback. */
> - call_rcu_func(&rh, rcu_barrier_callback);
> + rsp->call(&rh, rcu_barrier_callback);
>
> /*
> * Now that we have an rcu_barrier_callback() callback on each
> @@ -2390,7 +2387,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp,
> */
> void rcu_barrier_bh(void)
> {
> - _rcu_barrier(&rcu_bh_state, call_rcu_bh);
> + _rcu_barrier(&rcu_bh_state);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_bh);
>
> @@ -2399,7 +2396,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_bh);
> */
> void rcu_barrier_sched(void)
> {
> - _rcu_barrier(&rcu_sched_state, call_rcu_sched);
> + _rcu_barrier(&rcu_sched_state);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_sched);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
> index df3c2c8..15837d7 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
> @@ -350,6 +350,8 @@ struct rcu_state {
> u32 levelcnt[MAX_RCU_LVLS + 1]; /* # nodes in each level. */
> u8 levelspread[RCU_NUM_LVLS]; /* kids/node in each level. */
> struct rcu_data __percpu *rda; /* pointer of percu rcu_data. */
> + void (*call)(struct rcu_head *head, /* call_rcu() flavor. */
> + void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
>
> /* The following fields are guarded by the root rcu_node's lock. */
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> index 7cb86ae..6888706 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ static void __init rcu_bootup_announce_oddness(void)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
>
> -struct rcu_state rcu_preempt_state = RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_preempt);
> +struct rcu_state rcu_preempt_state =
> + RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_preempt, call_rcu);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_preempt_data);
> static struct rcu_state *rcu_state = &rcu_preempt_state;
>
> @@ -944,7 +945,7 @@ static int rcu_preempt_cpu_has_callbacks(int cpu)
> */
> void rcu_barrier(void)
> {
> - _rcu_barrier(&rcu_preempt_state, call_rcu);
> + _rcu_barrier(&rcu_preempt_state);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
>
> --
> 1.7.8
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-15 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-15 21:05 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/15] Improvements to rcu_barrier() and RT response on big systems Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:05 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/15] rcu: Control RCU_FANOUT_LEAF from boot-time parameter Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:05 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Size rcu_node tree from nr_cpu_ids rather than NR_CPUS Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:47 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 0:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 5:17 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 6:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 9:17 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 14:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 14:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 20:31 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:05 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/15] rcu: Prevent excessive line length in RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:48 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:05 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Place pointer to call_rcu() in rcu_data structure Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:08 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/15] rcu: Move _rcu_barrier()'s rcu_head structures to rcu_data structures Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:19 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/15] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_cpu_count to rcu_state structure Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:44 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/15] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_completion " Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:51 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/15] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_mutex " Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:55 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/15] rcu: Increasing rcu_barrier() concurrency Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:31 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 0:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-16 0:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 0:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/15] rcu: Add tracing for _rcu_barrier() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:35 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] rcu: Add rcu_barrier() statistics to debugfs tracing Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:38 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/15] rcu: Remove unneeded __rcu_process_callbacks() argument Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:37 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/15] rcu: Introduce for_each_rcu_flavor() and use it Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:52 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 1:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 5:35 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 6:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/15] rcu: Use for_each_rcu_flavor() in TREE_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:59 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 0:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 5:22 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 6:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/15] rcu: RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK code no longer ever dead Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 0:02 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 0:04 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 1:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:43 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/15] rcu: Control RCU_FANOUT_LEAF from boot-time parameter Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 22:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120615220824.GX31184@leaf \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.