From: Mattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>
To: Karol Babioch <karol@babioch.de>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: no brightness with acpi video since 3.3 [was Re: Issues with the sony-platform module]
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:07:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120616130705.GB2326@kamineko.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FDC6D0A.8080505@babioch.de>
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 01:24:58PM +0200, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Hi,
...
> > Can you try applying the sony-laptop patches on 3.2, boot with
> > acpi_backlight=vendor and see what is the state there?
> It behaves just like 3.3. What might be interesting is 3.1. Here some
> really strange values get returned:
>
> [root@vpcs nv_backlight]# cat actual_brightness brightness max_brightness
...
how about the sony-laptop stuff with 3.1+patches?
What is the output of
$ grep . /sys/class/backlight/*/*
$ grep . /sys/devices/platform/sony-laptop/*
and the kernel log after these two commands
I'm trying to understand is if the patch series I sent works for
you on the last working version of kernel (i.e. 3.1 apparently).
...
> I'm currently trying to reconstruct the last version that worked for me.
> I'm quite sure that "vaio-full-3.0.4.patch" (from here [1]), worked fine
> with the 3.1.x branch. However I've just recompiled 3.1.10 and it
> doesn't seem to work. Anyway it worked without the
> "acpi_backlight=vendor" parameter, so I'm not quite sure whether this is
> of interest for you right now.
it is actually. What did you have in the sony-laptop sysfs directories
when booting with acpi_backlight=vendor?
Thanks!
--
mattia
:wq!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-16 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-14 17:33 Issues with the sony-platform module Karol Babioch
2012-06-14 20:39 ` no brightness with acpi video since 3.3 [was Re: Issues with the sony-platform module] Mattia Dongili
2012-06-15 7:45 ` Karol Babioch
2012-06-15 11:36 ` Mattia Dongili
2012-06-15 12:08 ` Karol Babioch
2012-06-15 15:17 ` Karol Babioch
2012-06-15 22:37 ` Mattia Dongili
2012-06-15 23:13 ` Karol Babioch
2012-06-16 2:52 ` Mattia Dongili
2012-06-16 11:24 ` Karol Babioch
2012-06-16 13:07 ` Mattia Dongili [this message]
2012-06-16 18:07 ` Karol Babioch
2012-06-16 23:16 ` Mattia Dongili
2012-06-17 10:50 ` Karol Babioch
2012-06-18 22:19 ` Mattia Dongili
2012-06-19 10:48 ` Karol Babioch
2012-06-19 0:59 ` Zhang Rui
2012-06-19 13:57 ` Karol Babioch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120616130705.GB2326@kamineko.org \
--to=malattia@linux.it \
--cc=karol@babioch.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.