From: gmbnomis@gmail.com (Simon Baatz)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Dove clock support
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 01:06:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120619230610.GA3210@schnuecks.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE0E753.3010105@googlemail.com>
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:55:47PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarh wrote:
> On 06/19/2012 10:42 PM, Simon Baatz wrote:
> >Should we make this symmetric and add an enable function to gate_fn?
>
> I also thought about that issue and I think that as long as PHY is
> controlled by controller specific registers it should be handled
> by the driver and not by common clock framework.
>
> This is true for SATA and PCIe and will also remove the need for
> gate_fn - as long as it doen't break other orion-based SoCs. ...
If PHY control is part of the driver, where do we turn off PHYs that
are on by default and that we don't use?
Don't we still need something like gate_fn or the clk gate/phy gate
parent/child mechanism you propose?
- Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-19 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-18 0:07 RFC: [PATCH] ARM: Kirkwood: clk_register_gate_fn: add fn assignment Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-06-18 7:42 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-06-18 7:54 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-06-18 8:04 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-06-18 8:28 ` Dove clock support (was: Re: RFC: [PATCH] ARM: Kirkwood: clk_register_gate_fn: add fn assignment) Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-06-18 8:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-06-18 9:42 ` Dove clock support Sebastian Hesselbarh
2012-06-18 9:54 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-06-18 10:01 ` Sebastian Hesselbarh
2012-06-18 10:11 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-06-18 20:38 ` Sebastian Hesselbarh
2012-06-19 19:25 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-06-19 19:31 ` Sebastian Hesselbarh
2012-06-19 19:35 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-06-18 11:50 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-06-18 21:41 ` Dove clock support (was: Re: RFC: [PATCH] ARM: Kirkwood: clk_register_gate_fn: add fn assignment) Simon Baatz
2012-06-18 22:10 ` Dove clock support Sebastian Hesselbarh
2012-06-19 19:32 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-06-19 20:42 ` Simon Baatz
2012-06-19 20:43 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-06-19 20:55 ` Sebastian Hesselbarh
2012-06-19 23:06 ` Simon Baatz [this message]
2012-06-20 5:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-06-20 5:51 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-06-24 15:17 ` Simon Baatz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120619230610.GA3210@schnuecks.de \
--to=gmbnomis@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.