From: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Michael Leun <lkml20120218@newton.leun.net>
Cc: Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@gmail.com>,
<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ath9k_htc: Every 2nd packet 1000ms delayed in recent kernels
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:42:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120620071208.GA9619@vmraj-lnx.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120620085515.421571e1@xenia.leun.net>
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Michael Leun wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:43:05 +0530
> Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qca.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:33:15AM +0200, Michael Leun wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:11:38 +0530
> > > Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Michael Leun
> > > > <lkml20120218@newton.leun.net> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > ne-wlan1@elektra:/home/ml4> ping 192.168.2.1
> > > > > PING 192.168.2.1 (192.168.2.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
> > > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2010 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1011 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=11.5 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1.12 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=3.83 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1003 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=4.10 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=1003 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=3.95 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=1003 ms
> > > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=3.78 ms
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Please note the additional delay of ~1000ms every 2nd packet.
> > > > > This is Kernel 3.4.3, have seen it in 3.4.2 also. Does NOT
> > > > > happen in 3.3.1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is this Issue already known? If so, I can save the work
> > > > > bisecting...
> > > >
> > > > looks like some one reported this bug in kernel bugzilla. would be
> > > > saving us lot of time
> > > > if you can bisect it!
> > > >
> > >
> > > 0775f9f90cdaf40fbf69b3192b3dddb2b3436f45 is the first bad commit
> > > commit 0775f9f90cdaf40fbf69b3192b3dddb2b3436f45
> > > Author: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> > > Date: Thu Mar 8 15:02:06 2012 +0100
> > >
> > > mac80211: remove spurious BSSID change flag
> > >
> > > The BSSID has been set a lot earlier already and
> > > didn't change again in ieee80211_set_associated().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
> > >
> > > :040000 040000 67a19a39e4b04c16921a3758ddd2362e02e81dd3
> > > 4a7cbd327b59345b83fa613f893770fbf44220bb M net
> > >
> > > Reverting 0775f9f90cdaf40fbf69b3192b3dddb2b3436f45 from 3.4.3 fixes
> > > the issue.
> > >
> > Michael,
> >
> > Thanks for the analysis. Can you please try with the attached patch
> > without reverting mac80211 change?
>
> [forgotten attachment was added in later mail]
>
> Yes, that also solves the issue. I guess, you will look into getting
> that into mainline and stable asap?
>
Thanks Michael. I already posted the patch to l-w.
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/93099
-Rajkumar
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-20 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-19 6:51 ath9k_htc: Every 2nd packet 1000ms delayed in recent kernels Michael Leun
2012-06-19 9:41 ` Mohammed Shafi
2012-06-19 22:33 ` Michael Leun
2012-06-20 6:13 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2012-06-20 6:15 ` Michael Leun
2012-06-20 6:20 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2012-06-20 6:55 ` Michael Leun
2012-06-20 7:12 ` Rajkumar Manoharan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120620071208.GA9619@vmraj-lnx.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=rmanohar@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml20120218@newton.leun.net \
--cc=shafi.wireless@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.