From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q5KN2af9184118 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:02:36 -0500 Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 5z9QeggzeT53Xmup for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:02:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:02:32 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] types.h: implement intptr_t and uintptr_t Message-ID: <20120620230232.GN30705@dastard> References: <1338487534-14575-1-git-send-email-jengelh@inai.de> <20120620075216.GA24798@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120620075216.GA24798@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: joe@perches.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Engelhardt , bpm@sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:52:16AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I'd really like to get Jans type cleanups in XFS in for the next > merge window. Given the lack of feedback on lkml in favor or > against (u)intptr_t I'm tempted to add them to xfs_linux.h for now, > and then do another push to propagate them to kernel-wide types later. > > Is that fine with everybody? I'd just push it into the XFS tree and into linux-next. It's a relatively harmless set of changes, and if nobody cares enough about it except us, just push it and see what happens when people start noticing the conflicts it might cause.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758160Ab2FTXCg (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:02:36 -0400 Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.141]:17495 "EHLO ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757506Ab2FTXCf (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:02:35 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwKANVV4k95LOQs/2dsb2JhbABFtCQDgS+BCIIYAQEFOhwjEAgDDgouFCUDIROICrodFIsagRGFCgOVKYknhluCcQ Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:02:32 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jan Engelhardt , xfs@oss.sgi.com, joe@perches.com, bpm@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] types.h: implement intptr_t and uintptr_t Message-ID: <20120620230232.GN30705@dastard> References: <1338487534-14575-1-git-send-email-jengelh@inai.de> <20120620075216.GA24798@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120620075216.GA24798@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:52:16AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I'd really like to get Jans type cleanups in XFS in for the next > merge window. Given the lack of feedback on lkml in favor or > against (u)intptr_t I'm tempted to add them to xfs_linux.h for now, > and then do another push to propagate them to kernel-wide types later. > > Is that fine with everybody? I'd just push it into the XFS tree and into linux-next. It's a relatively harmless set of changes, and if nobody cares enough about it except us, just push it and see what happens when people start noticing the conflicts it might cause.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com