All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki
	<kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] memcg: clean up force_empty_list() return value check
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:13:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120621131328.1e906266.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE2D87D.2090500-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:17:01 +0900
Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> Now, mem_cgroup_force_empty_list() just returns 0 or -EBUSY and
> -EBUSY is just indicating 'you need to retry.'.
> This patch makes mem_cgroup_force_empty_list() as boolean function and
> make the logic simpler.
> 

For some reason I'm having trouble applying these patches - many
rejects, need to massage it in by hand.

> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3797,7 +3797,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
>    * This routine traverse page_cgroup in given list and drop them all.
>    * *And* this routine doesn't reclaim page itself, just removes page_cgroup.
>    */
> -static int mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +static bool mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>   				int node, int zid, enum lru_list lru)

Let's document the return value.  The mem_cgroup_force_empty_list()
comment is a mess so I tried to help it a bit.  How does this look?

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-make-mem_cgroup_force_empty_list-return-bool-fix
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3609,8 +3609,10 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_recl
 }
 
 /*
- * This routine traverse page_cgroup in given list and drop them all.
- * *And* this routine doesn't reclaim page itself, just removes page_cgroup.
+ * Traverse a specified page_cgroup list and try to drop them all.  This doesn't
+ * reclaim the pages page themselves - it just removes the page_cgroups.
+ * Returns true if some page_cgroups were not freed, indicating that the caller
+ * must retry this operation.
  */
 static bool mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 				int node, int zid, enum lru_list lru)
_


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] memcg: clean up force_empty_list() return value check
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:13:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120621131328.1e906266.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE2D87D.2090500@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:17:01 +0900
Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Now, mem_cgroup_force_empty_list() just returns 0 or -EBUSY and
> -EBUSY is just indicating 'you need to retry.'.
> This patch makes mem_cgroup_force_empty_list() as boolean function and
> make the logic simpler.
> 

For some reason I'm having trouble applying these patches - many
rejects, need to massage it in by hand.

> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3797,7 +3797,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
>    * This routine traverse page_cgroup in given list and drop them all.
>    * *And* this routine doesn't reclaim page itself, just removes page_cgroup.
>    */
> -static int mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +static bool mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>   				int node, int zid, enum lru_list lru)

Let's document the return value.  The mem_cgroup_force_empty_list()
comment is a mess so I tried to help it a bit.  How does this look?

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-make-mem_cgroup_force_empty_list-return-bool-fix
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3609,8 +3609,10 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_recl
 }
 
 /*
- * This routine traverse page_cgroup in given list and drop them all.
- * *And* this routine doesn't reclaim page itself, just removes page_cgroup.
+ * Traverse a specified page_cgroup list and try to drop them all.  This doesn't
+ * reclaim the pages page themselves - it just removes the page_cgroups.
+ * Returns true if some page_cgroups were not freed, indicating that the caller
+ * must retry this operation.
  */
 static bool mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 				int node, int zid, enum lru_list lru)
_


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] memcg: clean up force_empty_list() return value check
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:13:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120621131328.1e906266.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE2D87D.2090500@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:17:01 +0900
Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Now, mem_cgroup_force_empty_list() just returns 0 or -EBUSY and
> -EBUSY is just indicating 'you need to retry.'.
> This patch makes mem_cgroup_force_empty_list() as boolean function and
> make the logic simpler.
> 

For some reason I'm having trouble applying these patches - many
rejects, need to massage it in by hand.

> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3797,7 +3797,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(struct zone *zone, int order,
>    * This routine traverse page_cgroup in given list and drop them all.
>    * *And* this routine doesn't reclaim page itself, just removes page_cgroup.
>    */
> -static int mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +static bool mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>   				int node, int zid, enum lru_list lru)

Let's document the return value.  The mem_cgroup_force_empty_list()
comment is a mess so I tried to help it a bit.  How does this look?

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-make-mem_cgroup_force_empty_list-return-bool-fix
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3609,8 +3609,10 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_recl
 }
 
 /*
- * This routine traverse page_cgroup in given list and drop them all.
- * *And* this routine doesn't reclaim page itself, just removes page_cgroup.
+ * Traverse a specified page_cgroup list and try to drop them all.  This doesn't
+ * reclaim the pages page themselves - it just removes the page_cgroups.
+ * Returns true if some page_cgroups were not freed, indicating that the caller
+ * must retry this operation.
  */
 static bool mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 				int node, int zid, enum lru_list lru)
_



  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-21 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-18 11:57 [PATCH 1/2] memcg: remove -EINTR at rmdir() Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-18 11:57 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-18 11:57 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
     [not found] ` <4FDF17A3.9060202-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-18 11:59   ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg: clean up force_empty_list() return value check Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-18 11:59     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-18 11:59     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
     [not found]     ` <4FDF1830.1000504-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-18 13:31       ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-18 13:31         ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-18 13:31         ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-19 23:58     ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-19 23:58       ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-21  8:11       ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-21  8:11         ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
     [not found]         ` <4FE2D747.20506-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-21  8:17           ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-21  8:17             ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-21  8:17             ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
     [not found]             ` <4FE2D87D.2090500-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-21 20:13               ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-06-21 20:13                 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-21 20:13                 ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]                 ` <20120621131328.1e906266.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-22  0:04                   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-22  0:04                     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-22  0:04                     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-18 13:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] memcg: remove -EINTR at rmdir() Michal Hocko
2012-06-18 13:30   ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-19  0:09   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-19  0:09     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-19 12:40     ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-19 12:40       ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-21  8:26       ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-21  8:26         ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120621131328.1e906266.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm-de/tnxtf+jlsfhdxvbkv3wd2fqjk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.