All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	". James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: deferring __fput()
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 20:11:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120624181153.GA26182@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120624152050.GA24596@redhat.com>

On 06/24, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 06/23, Al Viro wrote:
> >
> > What we ought to
> > do instead of that is honestly keeping both the head of the (single-linked) list and
> > pointer to pointer to its last element.  Sure, that'll eat one more word in task_struct.
> > And it doesn't matter, since we'll be able to kill something else in there - namely,
> > ->scm_work_list.
>
> Still it is better to not add the second pointer, task->task_works can
> point to the last work, and last_work->next points to the first one.

So. task_struct has the single "struct task_work *last_twork" pointer,
task_work has ->next. I'll try to cleanup task_work_cancel() a bit, but
this all doesn't look too complicated, see below. (untested, probably
buggy, but hopefully close to correct).

Or do you still think we need the 2nd pointer in task_struct?

Oleg.

int
task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct task_work *twork, bool notify)
{
	unsigned long flags;
	struct task_work *last;
	int err = -ESRCH;

#ifndef TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
	if (notify)
		return -ENOTSUPP;
#endif
	/*
	 * We must not insert the new work if the task has already passed
	 * exit_task_work(). We rely on do_exit()->raw_spin_unlock_wait()
	 * and check PF_EXITING under pi_lock.
	 */
	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
	if (likely(!(task->flags & PF_EXITING))) {
		last = task->last_twork ?: twork;
		task->last_twork = twork;
		twork->next = last->next;
		last->next = twork;
		err = 0;
	}
	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);

	/* test_and_set_bit() implies mb(), see tracehook_notify_resume(). */
	if (likely(!err) && notify)
		set_notify_resume(task);
	return err;
}

struct task_work *
task_work_cancel(struct task_struct *task, task_work_func_t func)
{
	unsigned long flags;
	struct task_work *last;
	struct task_work *twork;
	struct task_work *prev;

	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
	last = twork = task->last_twork;
	if (!last)
		goto unlock;

	do {
		prev = twork;
		twork = twork->next;
		if (twork->func != func)
			continue;

		prev->next = twork->next;
		if (twork == last) {
			if (prev == twork)
				prev = NULL;
			task->last_twork = prev;
		}
		goto unlock;

	} while (twork != last);
	twork = NULL;

 unlock:
	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);

	return twork;
}

void task_work_run(void)
{
	struct task_struct *task = current;
	struct task_work *last;
	struct task_work *twork;
	struct task_work *next;

	raw_spin_lock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
	last = task->last_twork;
	task->last_twork = NULL;
	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task->pi_lock);

	if (unlikely(!last))
		return;

	next = last->next;
	do {
		twork = next;
		next = twork->next;
		twork->func(twork);
	} while (twork != last);
}


  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-24 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-22 12:44 deferring __fput() Mimi Zohar
2012-06-23  9:20 ` Al Viro
2012-06-23 19:45   ` Al Viro
2012-06-23 20:38     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-23 21:01       ` Al Viro
2012-06-23 21:11         ` Al Viro
2012-06-24  4:16         ` Al Viro
2012-06-24 10:09           ` Al Viro
2012-06-24 16:54             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-24 15:33           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-25  6:03             ` Al Viro
2012-06-25 15:18               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 18:37                 ` [PATCH 0/4] Was: " Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 18:37                   ` [PATCH 1/4] task_work: use the single-linked list to shrink sizeof(task_work) Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 18:37                   ` [PATCH 2/4] task_work: don't rely on PF_EXITING Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 18:38                   ` [PATCH 3/4] task_work: deal with task_work callbacks adding more work Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 18:38                   ` [PATCH 4/4] task_work: kill task_work->data Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 19:05                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-28  4:38                   ` [PATCH 0/4] Was: deferring __fput() Al Viro
2012-06-28 16:22                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-28 16:45                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-30  6:24                         ` Al Viro
2012-06-30 17:41                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-29  5:30                     ` Mimi Zohar
2012-06-29  8:33                       ` Al Viro
2012-06-29 13:02                         ` Mimi Zohar
2012-06-29 17:41                           ` Al Viro
2012-06-29 21:38                             ` Mimi Zohar
2012-06-29 23:56                               ` Mimi Zohar
2012-06-30  5:02                                 ` Al Viro
2012-07-01 19:50                                   ` Mimi Zohar
2012-07-01 20:57                                     ` Al Viro
2012-07-02  1:46                                       ` Mimi Zohar
2012-07-02  3:43                                         ` Al Viro
2012-07-02  5:11                                           ` Al Viro
2012-07-02 11:49                                             ` Mimi Zohar
2012-07-02 12:02                                               ` Al Viro
2012-07-02 13:01                                                 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-07-02 13:33                                                   ` Al Viro
2012-07-02 14:50                                                     ` Mimi Zohar
2012-08-21 13:05                                                       ` [PATCH] task_work: add a scheduling point in task_work_run() Eric Dumazet
2012-08-21 20:37                                                         ` Mimi Zohar
2012-08-21 21:32                                                           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-22  3:13                                                             ` Mimi Zohar
2012-08-22  5:27                                                         ` Michael Wang
2012-08-22  5:38                                                           ` Al Viro
2012-06-23 20:57     ` deferring __fput() Al Viro
2012-06-23 21:33       ` Al Viro
2012-06-24 15:20       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-24 18:11         ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-06-25 12:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-25 12:14         ` Al Viro
2012-06-25 13:19           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-25 13:53             ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120624181153.GA26182@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.