From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Linux-NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rpcauth_lookup_credcache() lock contentions
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:34:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120624213417.GI4152@tassilo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120623122604.GA10887@localhost>
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 08:26:04PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When doing parallel kernel builds on an NFSROOT system with 32 logical
> CPUs, I see half CPU time spent in kernel:
>
> top - 20:08:28 up 5:01, 8 users, load average: 62.97, 55.82, 54.56
> Tasks: 751 total, 80 running, 671 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> Cpu(s): 0.1%us, 53.5%sy, 46.4%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.1%si, 0.0%st
> Mem: 65401132k total, 36455604k used, 28945528k free, 0k buffers
> Swap: 0k total, 0k used, 0k free, 31858244k cached
>
> The attached lock_stat shows that rpcauth_lookup_credcache() has the
> outstanding contentions.
Hmm, the cache is already using RCU for the read case, just takes
a lock for writing. Or when checking an entry.
So you either have a lot of lookups on the same entry, or you thrash
the cache.
When you look up the look address, is it the one in the first loop?
If yes then it's the first.
I'm not fully sure why it takes the lock in the read case anyways. Neither
test_bit nor atomic_inc under RCU should need a lock, so I suppose
it can be just removed.
367 spin_lock(&cache->lock);
368 if (test_bit(RPCAUTH_CRED_HASHED, &entry->cr_flags) == 0) {
369 spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
370 continue;
371 }
372 cred = get_rpccred(entry);
373 spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
and get_rpccred is just
154 static inline
155 struct rpc_cred * get_rpccred(struct rpc_cred *cred)
156 {
157 atomic_inc(&cred->cr_count);
158 return cred;
159 }
Can you try this patch?
-andi
commit fa1eef2ec22f2fc31e0381b864044fbb753dd572
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun Jun 24 14:31:06 2012 -0700
sunrpc: remove useless spinlocks in credential lookup path
Fengguang noticed that rpcauth_lookup_credcache has high lock contention
on the nfs server when doing kernel builds on nfsroot.
There is no reason to take the spinlock in the read loop: the RCU
makes sure the object does not go away, and either test_bit
nor atomic_inc in get_rpccred() needs a lock.
So just remove the spinlock in the read lookup path.
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth.c b/net/sunrpc/auth.c
index 727e506..13c2b58 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/auth.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/auth.c
@@ -364,13 +364,10 @@ rpcauth_lookup_credcache(struct rpc_auth *auth, struct auth_cred * acred,
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, pos, &cache->hashtable[nr], cr_hash) {
if (!entry->cr_ops->crmatch(acred, entry, flags))
continue;
- spin_lock(&cache->lock);
if (test_bit(RPCAUTH_CRED_HASHED, &entry->cr_flags) == 0) {
- spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
continue;
}
cred = get_rpccred(entry);
- spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
break;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-24 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20120623122604.GA10887@localhost>
2012-06-23 15:07 ` rpcauth_lookup_credcache() lock contentions Fengguang Wu
2012-06-24 21:34 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2012-06-25 1:21 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-06-25 2:45 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-25 2:42 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-27 18:03 ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-27 18:36 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-07-05 13:11 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-05 15:05 ` Malahal Naineni
2012-07-05 16:29 ` Andi Kleen
2012-07-05 16:27 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120624213417.GI4152@tassilo.jf.intel.com \
--to=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.