From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: neilb@suse.de, axboe@kernel.dk, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
shli@fusionio.com
Subject: [patch 06/10 v3] raid5: reduce chance release_stripe() taking device_lock
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:24:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120625072641.504876596@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20120625072447.268095276@kernel.org
[-- Attachment #1: raid5-reduce-release_stripe-lock.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3794 bytes --]
release_stripe() is a place conf->device_lock is heavily contended. We take the
lock even stripe count isn't 1, which isn't required.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/md/raid5.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/md/raid5.c 2012-06-25 14:37:21.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/drivers/md/raid5.c 2012-06-25 14:38:13.899130571 +0800
@@ -196,49 +196,56 @@ static int stripe_operations_active(stru
test_bit(STRIPE_COMPUTE_RUN, &sh->state);
}
-static void __release_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh)
+static void handle_release_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh)
{
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&sh->count)) {
- BUG_ON(!list_empty(&sh->lru));
- BUG_ON(atomic_read(&conf->active_stripes)==0);
- if (test_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state)) {
- if (test_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state) &&
- !test_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state))
- list_add_tail(&sh->lru, &conf->delayed_list);
- else if (test_bit(STRIPE_BIT_DELAY, &sh->state) &&
- sh->bm_seq - conf->seq_write > 0)
- list_add_tail(&sh->lru, &conf->bitmap_list);
- else {
- clear_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state);
- clear_bit(STRIPE_BIT_DELAY, &sh->state);
- list_add_tail(&sh->lru, &conf->handle_list);
- }
- md_wakeup_thread(conf->mddev->thread);
- } else {
- BUG_ON(stripe_operations_active(sh));
- if (test_and_clear_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state))
- if (atomic_dec_return(&conf->preread_active_stripes)
- < IO_THRESHOLD)
- md_wakeup_thread(conf->mddev->thread);
- atomic_dec(&conf->active_stripes);
- if (!test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state)) {
- list_add_tail(&sh->lru, &conf->inactive_list);
- wake_up(&conf->wait_for_stripe);
- if (conf->retry_read_aligned)
- md_wakeup_thread(conf->mddev->thread);
- }
+ BUG_ON(!list_empty(&sh->lru));
+ BUG_ON(atomic_read(&conf->active_stripes)==0);
+ if (test_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state)) {
+ if (test_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state) &&
+ !test_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state))
+ list_add_tail(&sh->lru, &conf->delayed_list);
+ else if (test_bit(STRIPE_BIT_DELAY, &sh->state) &&
+ sh->bm_seq - conf->seq_write > 0)
+ list_add_tail(&sh->lru, &conf->bitmap_list);
+ else {
+ clear_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state);
+ clear_bit(STRIPE_BIT_DELAY, &sh->state);
+ list_add_tail(&sh->lru, &conf->handle_list);
+ }
+ md_wakeup_thread(conf->mddev->thread);
+ } else {
+ BUG_ON(stripe_operations_active(sh));
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state))
+ if (atomic_dec_return(&conf->preread_active_stripes)
+ < IO_THRESHOLD)
+ md_wakeup_thread(conf->mddev->thread);
+ atomic_dec(&conf->active_stripes);
+ if (!test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state)) {
+ list_add_tail(&sh->lru, &conf->inactive_list);
+ wake_up(&conf->wait_for_stripe);
+ if (conf->retry_read_aligned)
+ md_wakeup_thread(conf->mddev->thread);
}
}
}
+static void __release_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh)
+{
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&sh->count))
+ handle_release_stripe(conf, sh);
+}
+
static void release_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
{
struct r5conf *conf = sh->raid_conf;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
- __release_stripe(conf, sh);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&sh->count, &conf->device_lock)) {
+ handle_release_stripe(conf, sh);
+ spin_unlock(&conf->device_lock);
+ }
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
}
static inline void remove_hash(struct stripe_head *sh)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-25 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-25 7:24 [patch 00/10 v3] raid5: improve write performance for fast storage Shaohua Li
2012-06-25 7:24 ` [patch 01/10 v3] raid5: use wake_up_all for overlap waking Shaohua Li
2012-06-28 7:26 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-28 8:53 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-25 7:24 ` [patch 02/10 v3] raid5: delayed stripe fix Shaohua Li
2012-07-02 0:46 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-02 0:49 ` Shaohua Li
2012-07-02 0:55 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-25 7:24 ` [patch 03/10 v3] raid5: add a per-stripe lock Shaohua Li
2012-07-02 0:50 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-02 3:16 ` Shaohua Li
2012-07-02 7:39 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-03 1:27 ` Shaohua Li
2012-07-03 12:16 ` majianpeng
2012-07-03 23:56 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-04 1:09 ` majianpeng
2012-06-25 7:24 ` [patch 04/10 v3] raid5: lockless access raid5 overrided bi_phys_segments Shaohua Li
2012-06-25 7:24 ` [patch 05/10 v3] raid5: remove some device_lock locking places Shaohua Li
2012-06-25 7:24 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2012-07-02 0:57 ` [patch 06/10 v3] raid5: reduce chance release_stripe() taking device_lock NeilBrown
2012-06-25 7:24 ` [patch 07/10 v3] md: personality can provide unplug private data Shaohua Li
2012-07-02 1:06 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-25 7:24 ` [patch 08/10 v3] raid5: make_request use batch stripe release Shaohua Li
2012-07-02 2:31 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-02 2:59 ` Shaohua Li
2012-07-02 5:07 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-25 7:24 ` [patch 09/10 v3] raid5: raid5d handle stripe in batch way Shaohua Li
2012-07-02 2:32 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-25 7:24 ` [patch 10/10 v3] raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes Shaohua Li
2012-07-02 2:39 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-02 20:03 ` Dan Williams
2012-07-03 8:04 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120625072641.504876596@kernel.org \
--to=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=shli@fusionio.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.