From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:47498 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752693Ab2FYHnK (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 03:43:10 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 09:43:06 +0200 From: "Johannes Schild" Message-ID: <20120625074306.48500@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: LAYOUTCOMMIT/LAYOUTRETURN To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Guys, i have another question on pNFS. I looked at my Wireshark protocols, while i used the FILE-Layout, and i wondered why i have no LAYOUTCOMMIT/LAYOUTRETURN statements in my protocols. I transfered one file to my storage server (NETAPP Simulator 8.1 C-Mode) and i only got a LAYOUTGET. cat /proc/self/mountstats | grep LAYOUT says: nfsv4: bm0=0xfafe8fff,bml=0x60fdfffe,acl=0x3,sessions,pnfs=LAYOUT_NFSV4_1_FILES LAYOUTGET: 1 1 0 216 236 0 1 1 LAYOUTCOMMIT: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LAYOUTRETURN: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Is there any other way to verify that pnfs is used on client site? Thanks in advance Best Regards Johannes -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de